- Joined
- Sep 15, 2011
- Messages
- 1,776
- Reaction Score
- 1,381
It's Obama's fault.
You are soooo wrong. I read it in the Times today. It's Bush's fault.
It's Obama's fault.
Not 100% sure, but I think that the use of this picture on the football board may be a hanging offense.
I don't want McHugh's blood. From what I know he's done a good job overall with the BOT in academic and other non-athletic areas. But, sadly, this is a typical Connecticut good-old-boy-network situation where who you know as a state employee is more important than your actual job performance. LMcH's personal relationship with PP - including recruiting him for this job - is clouding his judgement. He probably should have stayed out of the hiring process in the first place and darn sure should not be involved in decision to retain him.
The Lane Kiffin reference is a red herring. No matter what happens USC is guaranteed a spot at the big-boy table. The hire of PP - and his and GDL's continued employment - has sent a message to the rest of the world that UConn, despite the $150 million plus invested in football, really isn't taking football seriously at the worst possible time.
Woof I am interested to see McHugh's take on this thing after next season. I can't see Pasqualoni doing enough to keep his job...and if he does bring GDL back aside from Michigan and posdibly MD games you will see crowds like were at the start of the Pitt game this season. Crickets McHugh definitley will hear if his buddy Paul doesn't get it...and I definitelt think he doesn't get it!
So...PP comes in and interviews for the Uconn job. Calls it his dream job and sells Hathaway and McHugh on the idea that he can create this pipeline to the program by embracing the high school coaches in the state and region, which in turn should also increase the local interest in the program. That had to be it, right?? And the AD, who couldn't promote a film in a prison and the Trustee of the Board who loves his Xavier football buy it?
dumb and dumber
McHugh was VERY vocal about getting rid of Hathaway for a while beore Edsall left. To say he disliked Hathaway is being nice from what I have been told (if anyone knows different please correct me)...I'm sure if/when McHugh suggested Pasqualoni to JH it was a done deal...as that spineless, gutless, worthless puke Hathaway would have done ANYTHING to get in McHugh's good graces to get his bonus with out any issues and keep McHugh off his back. Again if anyone on here is in the know and finds this WAY off base please correct me.McHugh take ? Don't beleive it was all Hathaway. McHugh has final say. No question about it
So...PP comes in and interviews for the Uconn job. Calls it his dream job and sells Hathaway and McHugh on the idea that he can create this pipeline to the program by embracing the high school coaches in the state and region, which in turn should also increase the local interest in the program. That had to be it, right?? And the AD, who couldn't promote a film in a prison and the Trustee of the Board who loves his Xavier football buy it?
dumb and dumber
So wait...because he said some nice things about our then-brand new football coach in a two-year old Courant article, we should demand some sort of public prostration from the man?
All righty!
Since we're making requests, I'd like all of the insane people here to adopt some sort of common avatar so that we can spot 'em at a distance.
Yeah, that was it. Oh, and the fact that he was the winningest coach in Big East history and he was employed in the NFL at the time. But yes, only those selling points....
who was fired and had been a vagabond assistant in the NFL for 8 years. and was 60 years old. Please. When he was hired it was mocked (rightfully so it appears) all over the country. Although somewhat irrelevent, it should be mentioned that PP got Nick Carparelli his first job out of school (cheshire ties) at Syracuse, so don't think that the Providence powers were not also supportive/pushing this hire. In fact, Carparelli applied for the UConn AD job that WM got, hoping that PP would be an advocate.
I'd buy that if we hadn't been competitive and playing for a bowl up until the last week both seasons. At 4-20 it is a different conversation.
If he wins 7 games next year he is .500. Not great, and not up to my expectations, but he isn't the worst BCS level coach out there.
It also isn't like PP had no resume and was hired solely because he was known.
I am not sure how to go back through a Twitter feed from two years ago, when my feed was filled with comments like "is that a joke?" "Is he still alive?" "really?" "P is not bad as long as he doesn't bring DeLeone" Most of my Syracuse friends were laughing at the hire. I also remember listening to SiriusXM college radio and Bill King basically concluding UConn didn't care about football with this hire (true?). As a fan of the Dolphins, I remember him being fired for continually being outcoached while DC. He was despised in south Florida if that is even possible. There were few if any here in this forum who hated this hire more than me, and he was my Saturday morning basketball coach when I was like 7 years old!
some of the comments at the end here mirrored my memory of what I was reading.
http://blog.ctnews.com/ostrout/2011/01/13/pasqualoni-taking-over-at-uconn/
I mean you aren't going to have a national news agency mock a hire. But try finding one who thinks it a great, or even good, hire.
I think there are more recent:
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...k-of-for-every-college-football-coach/page/24
http://collegespun.com/big-east/con...ny-having-paul-pasqualoni-as-uconn-head-coach
http://blogs.sites.post-gazette.com...-redshirt-diaries/23793-who-wont-be-the-coach
http://virginiatech.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=750&tid=160014719&mid=160014719&sid=1020
Whatever, at this point what does it matter. He will be the coach until they get invited into a real conference. If that day does not come, then UConn football is dead anyways.
"Gutless, worthless pukes" seem to be our forte when it comes to recent ADs. PP was a bad hire and most knew it. So many opportunities, yet the outcome was baked from day 1. The consultants were a classic maneuver to give cover to a pre-wired outcome. McHugh didn't just fall off the turnip truck.McHugh was VERY vocal about getting rid of Hathaway for a while beore Edsall left. To say he disliked Hathaway is being nice from what I have been told (if anyone knows different please correct me)...I'm sure if/when McHugh suggested Pasqualoni to JH it was a done deal...as that spineless, gutless, worthless puke Hathaway would have done ANYTHING to get in McHugh's good graces to get his bonus with out any issues and keep McHugh off his back. Again if anyone on here is in the know and finds this WAY off base please correct me.
"Gutless, worthless pukes" seem to be our forte when it comes to recent ADs. PP was a bad hire and most knew it. So many opportunities, yet the outcome was baked from day 1. The consultants were a classic maneuver to give cover to a pre-wired outcome. McHugh didn't just fall off the turnip truck.
Everybody wants the best for the program. There were plenty of critics especially in a comparative sense. There are intangibles including leadership, motivation and overall philosophy. Some argued go for the young hot prospects, and others for big names like RR with embedded recruiting networks. Pulling in an old guy whose career could be fairly described as in the twilight and on the downward slope (his NFL experience was not spectacular and headed towards journeyman staff status at best), made little sense for a program that had a chance to leverage off a programmatic high point.And by "knew it", meaning that most people didn't have any idea and read some blog posts by some disgruntled Syracuse fans that hated him and then co-opted those opinions as their own.
There were a number of people here that hated this from day one. And it turns out you were right (at least to date). Yay you.
I am not sure how to go back through a Twitter feed from two years ago, when my feed was filled with comments like "is that a joke?" "Is he still alive?" "really?" "P is not bad as long as he doesn't bring DeLeone" Most of my Syracuse friends were laughing at the hire. I also remember listening to SiriusXM college radio and Bill King basically concluding UConn didn't care about football with this hire (true?). As a fan of the Dolphins, I remember him being fired for continually being outcoached while DC. He was despised in south Florida if that is even possible. There were few if any here in this forum who hated this hire more than me, and he was my Saturday morning basketball coach when I was like 7 years old!
some of the comments at the end here mirrored my memory of what I was reading.
http://blog.ctnews.com/ostrout/2011/01/13/pasqualoni-taking-over-at-uconn/
I mean you aren't going to have a national news agency mock a hire. But try finding one who thinks it a great, or even good, hire.
I think there are more recent:
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...k-of-for-every-college-football-coach/page/24
http://collegespun.com/big-east/con...ny-having-paul-pasqualoni-as-uconn-head-coach
http://blogs.sites.post-gazette.com...-redshirt-diaries/23793-who-wont-be-the-coach
http://virginiatech.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=750&tid=160014719&mid=160014719&sid=1020
Whatever, at this point what does it matter. He will be the coach until they get invited into a real conference. If that day does not come, then UConn football is dead anyways.
where is that picture from? I like the car, pretty cool.The use of the picture was reverse-psychology. It was meant for guys (and gals) to say, "No, I don't recognize that picture at all....because I'm a man's man (or a woman's woman)....so let's talk some football, okay?"
The only people that are to be hanged are the ones that admit they get the reference...
Everybody wants the best for the program. There were plenty of critics especially in a comparative sense. There are intangibles including leadership, motivation and overall philosophy. Some argued go for the young hot prospects, and others for big names like RR with embedded recruiting networks. Pulling in an old guy whose career could be fairly described as in the twilight and on the downward slope (his NFL experience was not spectacular and headed towards journeyman staff status at best), made little sense for a program that had a chance to leverage off a programmatic high point.
The facts as they stand support the many that saw PP as a bad hire. Maybe it all miraculously gels in year 3, and I am gladly terribly wrong. I don't see it. Year 2 moved in the wrong direction on many fronts. Game decisions were bad as ever. The 118th worst offense is no easy accomplishment. So, indicators of progress are missing. You coach with what you have and the best get the best they can from them. He did not come close to doing that.
where is that picture from? I like the car, pretty cool.
kevin do you live in south florida? I do. I can tell you 75% of whatever fans they have left wouldnt even know he was on their team. furthermore he was the least of there worries as their defense was decent but the offense was struggling to make 15 points a gsme
...and the boom box and quite possibly his coat, just because he liked it.That picture was from the movie Just Say Anything. I'm pretty sure he was jamming the music "In Your Eyes" by Peter Gabriel...on a boombox...for the girl that he really liked. I can't wait for the sequel, when we find out how they got divorced and that she kept the car...
but he will still have his kick-boxing. and no job....and the boom box and quite possibly his coat, just because he liked it.