Lady Vols vs Texas | Page 7 | The Boneyard

Lady Vols vs Texas

Who Wins Lady Vols or Texas


  • Total voters
    95
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sometimes Karl Marx is right. From each according to her ability - Geno is no Marxist but he demands it from his players. Without it, Deshields and her teammates shone like cubic zirconia in Boling-Thomson arena this afternoon. In spite of her glorious Jim Crow tradition, Tennessee would do well to practice a little Marxism at home.
This isn't fair to cubit zirconium. At least that sparkles.
 
The players seem to have plenty of problems, too. But that is a coaching problem, too, as the talent as recruited does not seem to be capable or desirous of playing as a unit. Geno and CD put as much emphasis on fit and personality as flat out athleticism.

Agreed. We can assume the talent is there, given that Tennessee has like 7 HS All-Americans on their roster. It would seem it's the coach's responsibility to mold his/her players into a cohesive team. If the kids don't want to, or are incapable of playing as a unit, then that's on the coach- put them on the bench until they get the message. Or encourage them to transfer.
 
Agreed. We can assume the talent is there, given that Tennessee has like 7 HS All-Americans on their roster. It would seem it's the coach's responsibility to mold his/her players into a cohesive team. If the kids don't want to, or are incapable of playing as a unit, then that's on the coach- put them on the bench until they get the message. Or encourage them to transfer.
But when you have a whole team infected with the problem bench time may well be futile.
 
Permit me to invite your attention to several factors (that I mentioned without emphasis). Holly had n say about her assistants -- she was stuck with Pat's old crew. Wonder why the offense remains stagnant?

The new AD has caused an upheaval in the department, to the detriment of wbb.

And Pat's continuous presence surely is a hindrance to Holly.

Q. for you. Would Jeff Walz take that job under those conditions?


I agree with every point you make, Kib, as I usually do. And I'm not even a Tenn hater. Before the season, I gave Holly the benefit of the doubt, assuming she'd do a pretty good job with all that talent. But, watching that game today, I have to say that my opinion of her coaching abilities was probably too generous. It looked to me like schoolyard, half-court offense, a scheme in which Diamond inevitably excels, but I saw no sign that Holly had control of any kind of a game plan that resembled anything like what we've witnessed, not just from Geno, but a variety of top coaches. You are undoubtedly correct that her authority is dramatically undermined by her unique circumstances, but gee, hasn't she been head coach long enough now to demonstrate to all that she has a clue about teaching offensive schemes? Do you really think this is all only about how tightly she is handcuffed? OK, maybe you've convinced me to feel a bit sorry for her in the same generic sense that I feel sorry in advance for Geno's ultimate successor, clearly a no-win deal...or for any legendary coach's immediate successor. But the fact remains that she really does have top-tier talent at her disposal, talent that she successfully recruited, and she appears to be wasting it. Jeff Walz? Yeah, actually, I do think he could be tempted, if for no other reason that he'd be one-removed from Pat. Anyway, maybe I'm just spouting off and being too harsh...as always, I respect your opinion.
 
.-.
Will 2016-17 be a repetition of 2004-2005, when UConn lost eight games and went out in the Sweet 16? Personally, I think that is unlikely. The problem in 2004-2005 was poor guard play and no one handling the ball who really understood the offense. With Kia, Saniya, and Gabby around next year, that should not be a problem, and that should allow the good-but-not-great talent on the rest of the team to prevail, at least to the Final Four and perhaps to the National Championship. At that point, it will be of greater importance that the UConn coaching is better than that of other teams. That may be necessary to win against teams which (unlike this year) may actually have more talented rosters than UConn has.
Depends on what you call good or great, I guess. If Tuck comes back, I'd count her as great talent. Then there's KLS and Phee. Two top-tenners. Don't forget that DJB is/was a five-star recruit. Then there's Butler--you can't teach 6'5". Plus Dangerfield, third-ranked in her class.

I agree that UCONN will take a step back next year--Stewie and Mo are rare talents. But if Tuck comes back, and I think she will, UCONN will again have a very talented team. They might not win it, but barring injuries, they'll be right there with the rest of the best.
 
Permit me to invite your attention to several factors (that I mentioned without emphasis). Holly had n say about her assistants -- she was stuck with Pat's old crew. Wonder why the offense remains stagnant?

The new AD has caused an upheaval in the department, to the detriment of wbb.

And Pat's continuous presence surely is a hindrance to Holly.

Q. for you. Would Jeff Walz take that job under those conditions?
I would say that he would not. He's got a spiff situation where he is. The department is well run, he's got a superb facility to play home games in and recruit to. He's got great fan support. Admission requirements are no obstacle (not that they are at UT :D). He already plays in a top-notch conference for WBB. Finally, he's built something of his own.

So unless he likes the mountains, I would say no.

I can't see Mulkey doing it, either, but you never know.
 
DobbsRover2 said:
UTex shot 10 Fts in the last 46 seconds when Vols were intentionally fouling, so FT stats don't always show the reality. The good new: both teams pulled down 40+ rebounds. The bad news: both teams shot under 40%, with the Vols badly pungent at 30.4%. Maybe layups under stressful (or at least semi stressful conditions like with Rocky Top playing at high decibels) will be emphasized in practice this week.

You know you're in trouble when "pungent" does not adequately describe your offensive (pun intended) efficiency and it becomes necessary for observers to say "badly pungent" . . . .

Lol
 
I would say that he would not. .

Disregard reference to Walz.Let me rephrase the question. Would ANY prospective new HC agree to conditions like these?
1. Your assistants are already all in place. We know they are good because they all worked for Pat for many years.
2. Pat will remain to help you recruit, run practices, and deal with alumni and media. Should any assistants leave, look to her to find a replacement (maybe even young Tyler). You are fortunate to have her at all games and in team meetings.
3. You are lucky -- the AD won't bother you much -- his focus is on football.​

Got the idea?
 
Wilt's athleticism was off the charts. He was simply amazing in the number of sports in which he was capable. Dick Schapp, also, reported Wilt had a gift for language and was able to converse in six or seven.

Listen to the Icebear.. he knows that of which he speaks.
You can find many citations of "the Dipper's" athletic records in field, track, weight lifting, and volleyball....
But, for a good read, try:
Wilt: Just Like Any Other Seven-Foot Black Millionaire Who Lives Next Door. Wilt Chamberlain & David Shaw New York: Macmillan, 1973.
[Just don't ask to borrow my autographed copy.]
 
.-.
Let's be honest and acknowledge that while UConn doesn't "hoover up" all the best recruits every year, in this particular year they have two seniors who are THE two most talented WCBB players in the country. With a more than capable supporting cast, and the experience of playing together in the same offensive and defensive systems for three years, that makes the success (actual and anticipated) rather predictable.

All of WCBB will get more interesting next year when those two transcendent talents are removed from the picture. UConn (not very sadly) will be "left" with a number of very good players, none of whom may be WNBA lottery picks in the year of their graduation. Those returning players will also have played together under the same offensive and defensive systems for multiple years (in most cases). They may actually win games by single digits, or possibly even lose a few by single digits.

Will 2016-17 be a repetition of 2004-2005, when UConn lost eight games and went out in the Sweet 16? Personally, I think that is unlikely. The problem in 2004-2005 was poor guard play and no one handling the ball who really understood the offense. With Kia, Saniya, and Gabby around next year, that should not be a problem, and that should allow the good-but-not-great talent on the rest of the team to prevail, at least to the Final Four and perhaps to the National Championship. At that point, it will be of greater importance that the UConn coaching is better than that of other teams. That may be necessary to win against teams which (unlike this year) may actually have more talented rosters than UConn has.
Well stated Joe- we'll be talented next year , but beatable. Nurse will take the point I think, unless Soniya is capable. She still looks like she's non existent on defense. We will see Butler and the three freshmen a lot this year- as we will be a much different team this year- much different. A lot of teams have been loading up!
 
Well stated Joe- we'll be talented next year , but beatable. Nurse will take the point I think, unless Soniya is capable. She still looks like she's non existent on defense. We will see Butler and the three freshmen a lot this year- as we will be a much different team this year- much different. A lot of teams have been loading up!
I think Saniya has been playing excellent defense.
 
Well stated Joe- we'll be talented next year , but beatable. Nurse will take the point I think, unless Soniya is capable. She still looks like she's non existent on defense. We will see Butler and the three freshmen a lot this year- as we will be a much different team this year- much different. A lot of teams have been loading up!


Should be very interesting next season...very good players...very good
Just no super-superstar...-2
If Geno gets another Nat. Championship out of them, he will have done a terrific coaching job.
But also look around the NCAA woman's field this year.
Seems like no one wants to be in the top 5
We still may have the most talent with lots of potential, almost superstars amongst us.
 
What is with the notion that a head coach is "stuck" with his/her assistants..... if a change is needed then so be it.... make that change happen..... Voila!
 
.-.
Should be very interesting next season...very good players...very good
Just
no super-superstar...-2
If Geno gets another Nat. Championship out of them, he will have done a terrific coaching job.
But also look around the NCAA woman's field this year.
Seems like no one wants to be in the top 5
We still may have the most talent with lots of potential, almost superstars amongst us.
We have a couple young HS superstars with another one on the way. My hunch is that superstardom will translate to this level for at least one of them, and we will be in great shape next year.
 
This game was between the #4 team TN and the b#8 team TX! ARE YOU KIDDING ME?????
These are 2 of the top 10 teams in the USA?
They both were terrible! TN was just more terrible than TX!
I have said many times before that TN will never make another Final Four ever! DD, the greatest WBB player ever since CP3 was the greatest WBB ever, will not lead TN to any promise land! The outhouse maybe, but certainly not the FF!
And I'm glad Russell had both feet operated on and she's still slower than me at 68 trying to go from the couch to the bathroom with an arthritic right hip!
How the powers that be at the University at TN can watch this excuse for a WCBB team an not run Holly Warlick out of town, is beyond belief!
But I still pray that Holly stays the HC at TN forever, as I need a good laugh at least once a week!
 
Should be very interesting next season...very good players...very good
Just no super-superstar...-2
If Geno gets another Nat. Championship out of them, he will have done a terrific coaching job.
But also look around the NCAA woman's field this year.
Seems like no one wants to be in the top 5
We still may have the most talent with lots of potential, almost superstars amongst us.
That is very true.
I think Saniya has been playing excellent defense.
you have noticed that IB? Then I hope I'm wrong. I hold my opinion until I see more- :) she is obviously offensively gifted!
 
I saw this game. Not sure what Tennessee was trying to do. (Other than trying to give the game away). They took Russell out and left Graves in , alone , to battle Texas's big frontline. then it looked like the Tennessee guards was playing helter-skelter with no offensive gameplan. It was not a pretty game to watch. Deshields had a good game. But it looked like it was always 1 against 5.

If the Huskies meet up with Tennessee in the Big Dance , unless Tennessee gets a lot better , The Huskies have nothing to fear.
 
What is with the notion that a head coach is "stuck" with his/her assistants..... if a change is needed then so be it.... make that change happen..... Voila!
i totally agree with this. it's time for an offensive minded coach at TN
 
.-.
I have the feeling Chong can replace Moiah next year. Hope I am right.

She will replace her in body alone...certainly not in talent. I cannot imagine that anyone thinks that Chong is going to turn into Jefferson over the summer.
 
I'm not sure if anyone has noticed, but most of the top 10 teams are struggling this year. Most teams have had quite a few changes in personnel and have looked ragged so far. Each team has had some ugly wins...or losses. So, once again, it's UCONN and then everyone else.
 
I didn't get to see the game, but based on the box score it looks like DeShields is the only Tennessee player that was productive. She was 9-22 from the floor (4-7 from three point range) and had 11 rebounds. Maybe the box score is misleading?
 
I didn't get to see the game, but based on the box score it looks like DeShields is the only Tennessee player that was productive. She was 9-22 from the floor (4-7 from three point range) and had 11 rebounds. Maybe the box score is misleading?
No you got it right
 
Margo is spot on. Could not have said it better. I do not understand why Mercedes Russell wants to stay out past the 3 point line and pass the ball.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
167,947
Messages
4,545,948
Members
10,428
Latest member
CarloPFF


Top Bottom