I think Tina is underrated in the W and overall as evidenced by her not making the top 20, and that shows she is hugely underrated in that league and, as I said, LaChina didn't limit the answer to just their college days.
But as regards who I would take off. I will admit that I would say Parker, but honestly she would be the last one I would take off. Only Maya and Diana would I put ahead of Tina. I don't think Parker is as much of a force at both ends of the court. In fact, this year, Tina is outperforming Candace in both points and rebounds and is tied with her in assists. Which is not to say that I don't have the utmost respect for Candace Parker. I think it was a shame that she was left off the Olympic team. I still can't get my head around that.
But my reasoning in regards to the other players is that the WNBA is currently much better than it used to be. The players are just better. I've watched avidly since the beginning and that's what my eyes tell me. And in the six and a half years since Tina has entered the league she has been one of the top performers at both ends of the court. She has a more complete game than anyone. She is the most consistent. If I was having a pickup game of W players, I would probably pick her first. She is tough as nails in the paint, which is probably more important than any other aspect of the game. She's a terror on the glass and has the best post moves.
Yet people don't really think of her in the same way as a Candace, Maya, or Dianna. That is why I say she is underrated. And when people make up a list that says that Teresa Weatherspoon, Ticha Penicheiro, Deanna Nolan, Cappie Pondexter, etc. have been greater WNBA players than her, that is when I say she is grossly underrated.
Thanks for asking.