- Joined
- Jul 13, 2013
- Messages
- 3,183
- Reaction Score
- 8,917
On 11/13/11 , the first game of the 2011-12 season and KML's first at UConn, she was 3 of 12 from the field (o of 7 from 3 pt range) and scored 7 points in 28 minutes of play against Holy Cross. Two days later, KLM had a great game against Pacific. 25 points in 25 minutes (5 of 6 from 3 pt.range)
In the 4th and 5th games that year against those juggernauts FDU and Buffalo, KML scored a combined 13 points in 50 minutes of play.
She was 4 of 20 from the floor which included going 2 of 11 from 3. She was playing a consistent 25+ minutes a game but her performances varied widely, as you might expect from a freshman.
Just as KML's future career path shouldn't have been drawn after her first game, KLS shouldn't be after 2 games. I understand the need for some people to go on the record with their opinion's. What I don't understand is why they would want to do it with virtually no basis in fact.
To base KLS's performance over the next 4 years after 2 games is just as invalid as it would have been to base KML's career path at UConn after just one game or on her 4th and 5th games.
In the 4th and 5th games that year against those juggernauts FDU and Buffalo, KML scored a combined 13 points in 50 minutes of play.
She was 4 of 20 from the floor which included going 2 of 11 from 3. She was playing a consistent 25+ minutes a game but her performances varied widely, as you might expect from a freshman.
Just as KML's future career path shouldn't have been drawn after her first game, KLS shouldn't be after 2 games. I understand the need for some people to go on the record with their opinion's. What I don't understand is why they would want to do it with virtually no basis in fact.
To base KLS's performance over the next 4 years after 2 games is just as invalid as it would have been to base KML's career path at UConn after just one game or on her 4th and 5th games.