- Joined
- Dec 5, 2018
- Messages
- 1,747
- Reaction Score
- 6,889
Clearly this is just what UConn needs, another guard. Wasn't there a long discussion not to very long ago about the backcourt logjam that Westbrook would cause if she came to UConn? Laksa is surely a very fine player but let's be reasonable.
It’s 1 year only, and there is no guarantee for Evina Westbrook next year. She helps bridge the gap.Clearly this is just what UConn needs, another guard. Wasn't there a long discussion not to very long ago about the backcourt logjam that Westbrook would cause if she came to UConn? Laksa is surely a very fine player but let's be reasonable.
What guard logjam next year? Crystal Dangerfield, CW, Ania M and Molly for sure. Maybe Evina. We know that Laksa can score against D1 top teams. We know Molly is challenged on that and we don’t know if Ania can yet.Clearly this is just what UConn needs, another guard. Wasn't there a long discussion not to very long ago about the backcourt logjam that Westbrook would cause if she came to UConn? Laksa is surely a very fine player but let's be reasonable.
Clearly this is just what UConn needs, another guard. Wasn't there a long discussion not to very long ago about the backcourt logjam that Westbrook would cause if she came to UConn? Laksa is surely a very fine player but let's be reasonable.
I think everyone is also assuming Laksa will be healthy enough to play. That may or may not be the case.
No way she wouldn’t start here.She's played 3 years and has but one year of eligibility. If she were to come to UConn the odds are that Westbrrok will be on sitting out the season and both Muhl & Bueckers are still a year away. So the guards next season could be Dangerfield, Williams, Makurat, Bent & Laksa. Not so many. Could see CD, CW & the Pole start with Laksa the 1st off the bench.
I think that she is supposed to be a crackerjack three point shooter. It might be nice to bring her in for 10 or 15 minutes to pick up 12 points and give someone a rest. Not bad for one year. They have the scholarships. It is not like wasting anything.
That's fine from UConn's point of view, but where's the benefit to Laksa? If she stays in college for another year, it will probably be to raise her visibility and stock for the WNBA. Geno has a great record of prepping kids for the W, but I'm not sure that 10-15 minutes per game would really prove beneficial to her, even if next year's draft is likely to be pretty weak.
You don't put your name in the portal if you intend to turn pro. Her DoB is May 21, 1996-significant because Laska could have declared for the WNBA draft in April 2018-BEFORE HER INJURY if turning pro was what she wanted.Exactly. Laksa has achieved all she needs to achieve. And though another year might prove her to be a bit better to the scouts, she could also be worse after the surgery and rehab. Indeed, she is now, quite literally, damaged goods. So Laksa needs to look out for Laksa and turn pro, preferably in Europe.
Maybe. Frankly though I think Westbrook's chance of getting a waiver is about 65-70%. Just my opinion. Even if not, what then? Many have opined that it takes a good minute to get up to speed in Geno's system. To me this is doubly so for guards. Laksa's great advantages are her movement without the ball and off the screen. Her great disadvantages are her tendency to become frustrated, go cold for extended periods, and her poor defensive skills. So, is this really a good fit? She's also not the best ball handler.She's played 3 years and has but one year of eligibility. If she were to come to UConn the odds are that Westbrrok will be on sitting out the season and both Muhl & Bueckers are still a year away. So the guards next season could be Dangerfield, Williams, Makurat, Bent & Laksa. Not so many. Could see CD, CW & Ania start with Laksa the 1st off the bench.
Wanna bet?"You can't have too many guards!"
Maybe. Frankly though I think Westbrook's chance of getting a waiver is about 65-70%. Just my opinion. Even if not, what then? Many have opined that it takes a good minute to get up to speed in Geno's system. To me this is doubly so for guards. Laksa's great advantages are her movement without the ball and off the screen. Her great disadvantages are her tendency to become frustrated, go cold for extended periods, and her poor defensive skills. So, is this really a good fit? She's also not the best ball handler.
That's a good point, but she has 4 more months to heal and rehab. Hopefully, she'll not take longer than that to recover. She was injured very early last season.I think everyone is also assuming Laksa will be healthy enough to play. That may or may not be the case.
Laska's injury ACL tear was 16 November 2018. That will almost be exactly a year by the time the new season starts. the extent of the tear, the type of repair and the rigor of rehab are all variable factors for a recovery timeline which is usually 12 to 18 months to full recovery.That's a good point, but she has 4 more months to heal and rehab. Hopefully, she'll not take longer than that to recover. She was injured very early last season.