Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Ldandy, post: 4688416, member: 4584"] I believe that you're correct with your line of reasoning. UVA and UNC have long been in the cross hairs of The B1G as realignment targets. I believe that the conference will do whatever needs to be done to secure what are considered the two premier programs within those states. GT, while they've floundered athletically over the last few years, are still AAU, located in a major media market, and are in a state that is home to many B1G Alums. No one is going to argue that they are an equal brand to UGA, however having representation in the state for negotiating linear TV Deals and recruiting student athletes will be very important going forward. Miami to me is interesting. Prior to AAU Membership I would have said that they were a longshot at best. FSU profiles more closely as a B1G Type Institution as Dayooper has pointed out, however I believe philosophically they align far better with the SEC. Same goes for Clemson. Miami, despite being in the South is much more Northeast leaning due to their time in both The ACC and Big East Conferences. They recruit the Northeast heavily for students, and their leadership is much more aligned with the schools of The B1G as opposed to The SEC. Having a warm weather location for early season Spring sports like baseball, softball, track etc. to compete would be ideal as well. Where does that leave The PAC in all this? For a long time, people have assumed that UO and UW were locks as future conference members. Honestly I'm not so sure about that anymore. Neither school provides any relief as potential travel partners for USC or UCLA. They would simply add more cross-country flights for the majority of the conference. It could be argued that targeting Stanford for their location, academics, and overall AD + ASU (Now AAU) for their market, proximity to SoCal, and similar institutional profile to most of The B1G could make them a more attractive option than the Pacific Northwest Schools. We can't forget that ND will remain a target as long as they cling to independence. A Notre Dame addition could knock out one of The ACC Schools in a race to 20, or force growth to 24 with more PAC or ACC Additions. It will definitely be interesting to see things play out. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom