Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="uconnyankee, post: 3142071, member: 2041"]
It was my premise that an AAC with Boise and BYU would lead to more money because a leage with those two plus Houston, Memphis, Cincy, and UCF would get in the national conversation and maybe get several teams in the Top 25 and even 1 in Top 10.  It would also have more 'meaningful' games which is what Networks want to pay for.

EVERY single move so far in college football has been about money and getting more of it today, tomorrow, and as far into the future as possible.  I am not aware of a single move where the school put as the top priority, a chance to go undefeated.   If that were the case UofL would not have gone to ACC, Maryland and Rutgers would not have gone to Big and W Virginia would still be in the ACC.

If everything else held, sure, why would Boise move?  But that's not my point.

So, to answer your question, even though you continue to ignore my point, The EXACT INCENTIVE for Boise would be the following:
 
a.  More Money
b.  More Money
c.  More Money
d.  More Money
e.  Better Conference
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach