Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Watchdog, post: 3662813, member: 10325"] What struck me was the large percentage of very low rated recruits. Taking out the three that were unranked, here's the numbers for the 14 that were ranked on 247 in five years: -9 of the 14 were over 161; -6 of the 14 were over 263; and 4 of the 14 were 335 and higher. In the last class he may have had a hand in (2019) the four high school kids were 168, 192, 326 and 473. Not exactly great, but some might argue it was the location or head coach who impacted recruiting. [/QUOTE]