- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,004
- Reaction Score
- 3,326
Getting blown out by Georgia Tech who is 0-2 with a loss to Mercer. Maybe putting out AAU teams at the college level isn’t the greatest idea...
They simply aren’t very good and have no depth. Jacob Toppin a URI role player coming off the bench last year is getting minutes for them. Strange to see them without the talent.
He did that pre-emptively this year. Beyond predictable.Cue Squid making excuses saying this is young, inexperienced team.
I mean, their decade with Calipari is pretty darn good.Getting blown out by Georgia Tech who is 0-2 with a loss to Mercer. Maybe putting out AAU teams at the college level isn’t the greatest idea...
Duke, Gonzaga, Houston, Memphis and others caught on to Caligari's game and are beating him at his own game. Time for him to go back to the NBA. He'll never win in college again.You mean GLAD to see them without talent!!
And you have to remember the kids who join the program don't have winning a championship as their number 1 goal. Where they get drafted is there biggest concern.I mean, their decade with Calipari is pretty darn good.
1 Title
1 Runner-up
4 Final Fours
7 Elite 8s
8 S16s
Only a few programs in the country would not want to trade with them.
This year, right now, they suck. And we can enjoy that. But they'll be better by the end off the year, and if not they'll have a new crop of young kids next year and probably be a fixture in the Top 10.
I mean, their decade with Calipari is pretty darn good.
1 Title
1 Runner-up
4 Final Fours
7 Elite 8s
8 S16s
Only a few programs in the country would not want to trade with them.
This year, right now, they suck. And we can enjoy that. But they'll be better by the end of the year, and if not they'll have a new crop of young kids next year and probably be a fixture in the Top 10.
I disagree. It's a tried and true rule that experience is essential to field a championship team. Kentucky will never have that continuity that true championship teams have.You could argue, in context, those results are mediocre. When you consider he brings in a top 5 recruiting class almost every year, 1 title isn't saying much.
You can make that argument. I think it would be wrong, though. In addition @Hey Adrien! 's note, I also think your comparison to Wooden is off.You could argue, in context, those results are mediocre. When you consider he brings in a top 5 recruiting class almost every year, 1 title isn't saying much. For a other programs those results would be good, but not with the talent he brings in. Imagine if Wooden only won one title with all the talent he had at UCLA back in the day. He wouldn't look so special now.