- Joined
- Aug 25, 2011
- Messages
- 14,456
- Reaction Score
- 79,078
Ooph that roster and being the top spenders…
Yeah I was going to say I don't follow recruiting that closely - or at all - anymore but that being a $22M roster seems a bit odd.
Ooph that roster and being the top spenders…
I only count non-segregated national titles.KY does have 8 titles. It's not like they don't have any, and they do have a somewhat recent one in 2012.
Just like Cal does. And refresh my memory, what did GA football do between Herschel and Smart? I'm just a casual CFB follower and nothing comes to my mind.Kirby sells kids on being their path to the NFL (which is far more established than UConn and the NBA).
I get it. The quote about no championships for UK I don't agree with. Recently, not much, thanks to Calipari. But Kansas, UNC also have titles that go way back (with recent success also). I just view the history of the game in a different way.Uggh - modern era please. It is REALLY hard to qualify their 4 titles pre 1958 other than pieces for a museum. I'll even give them the 1978 title as part of the conversation, since they beat Duke.
Yale could brag about having the best college football program of all time with their 18 titles. Get what I'm saying?
That's not what any of the articles say. They say the $20 million was for their entire roster. Where did you see that was just for transfers? Imagine being a star player on the team and seeing all the transfers get way more than you're getting? That would be a chemistry nightmare.Texas and USC are at the top. OSU spent far more than $20 million last year, that number was just for transfers.
Same way kid from Auburn is - he’s on his second wife and still playing.Also how is Nijel Pack still in college?
The different way imo is that UConn is the best. They’re relatively late comers who some don’t view as a blue blood (that depends on how you want to define it and that’s fine) but for those that are living and breathing today the Huskies are certifiably the top dogs!I get it. The quote about no championships for UK I don't agree with. Recently, not much, thanks to Calipari. But Kansas, UNC also have titles that go way back (with recent success also). I just view the history of the game in a different way.
I pretty much see it this way too and that’s why I respect Duke’s status substantially more than UCLA, KY, and UNC. Duke has nearly as many championships as UConn in essentially the same timeframe but with more success in the non-championship years.The different way imo is that UConn is the best. They’re relatively late comers who some don’t view as a blue blood (that depends on how you want to define it and that’s fine) but for those that are living and breathing today the Huskies are certifiably the top dogs!
Just like Cal or just like Hurley? Landrew just committed -- likely for less -- because Hurley sold him on being his best path to the NBA.Just like Cal does. And refresh my memory, what did GA football do between Herschel and Smart? I'm just a casual CFB follower and nothing comes to my mind.
I honestly don't remember where that Spring of 2024 info came from. Of course where these numbers come from and their length of time involved are often sketchy.That's not what any of the articles say. They say the $20 million was for their entire roster. Where did you see that was just for transfers? Imagine being a star player on the team and seeing all the transfers get way more than you're getting? That would be a chemistry nightmare.
You know what I'm talking about - over the past 2.5 decades the Yankees have spent the most money and have one chip.Hasn't been true in quite a long time. The Dodgers have been the biggest spenders in MLB for years. And in 2025 the Dodgers were #2 behind the Mets.
Over the past 25 years the Yanks have spent the most money and have one chip to show for it.Hasn't been true in quite a long time. The Dodgers have been the biggest spenders in MLB for years. And in 2025 the Dodgers were #2 behind the Mets.
You can't really compare it to pro sports because pro sports have a draft, arbitration, etc. Most of the biggest baseball stars are under control of the team that drafted them until they're close to 30, so I think the payroll gap in MLB can be a little misleading. Paul Skenes, for instance, made $740K last season and probably something similar this year. Tarik Skubal made $2.5 million last year and $10 million this year despite being worth probably 5x that much on the open market. A lot of times, the small market teams end up getting a player's best years while the big markets pay a premium for declining, broken down stars.As a UConn and Big East fan I am not terribly concerned about the Kentucky NIL because I don't think you can spend yourself into a championship. In professional sports the highest payroll does not directly correlate to the most success. For example in major league baseball (which has no real salary cap and minimal guardrails against organizations looking to outspend the competition) the teams remaining in the playoffs are ranked 2, 5, 16 and 23 in terms of highest payroll. Of the top 10 MLB payrolls in 2025, 4 missed the playoffs entirely, including the team with the highest payroll. Also keep in mind that in college basketball you have a roster of 15, however it's the first 7 to 9 members of the team that will usually determine the success of the team in any given season, so the total payroll may not correlate to amounts needed to pay and retain the top tier of the roster, which is the key to roster construction in the NIL era.
Me too, while also hoping their coach is safe, seeing how Kentucky fans are...That is insane. I’m rooting for them to fall flat on their faces.
Yes, totally agreed. OSU brings in probably 150MM in revenue for football, Kentucky probably $40MM, so it's really insane to spend the same on players...That amount does surprise me. Ohio State spent about $20 million on their football team last year. And football has a lot more players and also I'm sure OSU football makes a lot more money than Kentucky basketball. So yeah that number is surprising. At least OSU did win the championship. Let's see what Kentucky does.
Ohio State AD projects football roster cost 'around $20 million' in NIL money | FOX Sports
Ohio State's estimate of $20 million in NIL money spent on its football roster is believed to be the highest in the nation.www.foxsports.com
Agreed, but for the folk handing over the money, I am not sure the profitability of the program is all that important. Even in the anOSU case, it was about Michigan winning a title.Yes, totally agreed. OSU brings in probably 150MM in revenue for football, Kentucky probably $40MM, so it's really insane to spend the same on players...
dameliohuskies.com
magazine.uconn.edu
So you agree Georgia did nothing in all that time?Just like Cal or just like Hurley? Landrew just committed -- likely for less -- because Hurley sold him on being his best path to the NBA.
Georgia football was from casual recall typically the second best team in the SEC East to Florida (they did have their bad coaching hire and took time to recover). When Georgia did have their moments and played in the SEC championship game it was against the best team in the best division in college football. So there title hopes ended there because they could never overcome those opponents (and still can't beat Alabama).
UConn should be able to stay on the right side of that ledger. The exceptional players will succeed and/or leave early for the NBA (Alex Karaban, Tristen Newton, Stephon Castle). We've already seen players who haven't panned out leave for other programs which is probably best for the player and for UConn. Guys who are in the middle, I think they will want to remain part of UConn Basketball with a chance to win a ring. There may be the rare stud who thinks he can do better somewhere else, sure it may happen. But rarely.Point is, there are built-in advantages for the have-nots in professional sports that do not exist in college. What concerns me moving forward isn't whether we can get the players, but whether we can keep them. Guys like Calhoun made a career out of nabbing underrated recruits because he essentially had them locked up for 3-4 years once they got to campus. I think UConn men's basketball will always have enough booster support to bring in good players, but to build a champion you're going to need the money to keep them. We seem to be on the right side of that ledger...for now. But schools like FAU and Iona that built championship quality rosters only to be raided by the P2 provide a cautionary tale of what can happen if the gap ever grows too wide.
Let me get back to you in a couple of days to tell you how many times they ended up in the top 10 and 25 while doing "nothing." (Or perhaps not.) They weren't chopped liver.So you agree Georgia did nothing in all that time?
Let me get back to you in a couple of days to tell you how many times they ended up in the top 10 and 25 while doing "nothing." (Or perhaps not.) They weren't chopped liver.
But yes, Kirby has them where they haven't been since Vince Dooley.