Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CL82, post: 3284744, member: 44"] The thing is that the university took inconsistent positions with different regulatory agencies. With the NCAA they said, yeah we think it these were valid courses and you can't tell us otherwise but with the accrediting agency they stated that were invalid courses run by rogue staff. It can't be both. The NCAA could have looked at the statements to the accrediting agency and found that the university lied to the NCAA, that the scores were not valid, by way of the admission to the accrediting agency, for APR purposes and recalculated player APR GPAs. If players who participated in games were found not to be eligible, those games would be deemed a forfeit. Finally, the coach/school should have been slapped with "failure to monitor" for allowing the fake courses to be included in APR. It was easily "doable." The NCAA chose not to do it. [/QUOTE]