- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,088
- Reaction Score
- 2,527
That should be enough to get some folks off the ledge.
NEVER!
That should be enough to get some folks off the ledge.
I have been saying this for years as attendance dwindled even for Big East hoops games. Perception is everything at this point. Let's shut up bveh or whatever the trolls name on the national board is. My math says if you charge $10.00 less per ticket and sell out as opposed to drawing 30000 at the higher price revenue drops $100000. However if those 10000 each spend $10.00 the money is recouped. But what a difference in perception the full house makes
You also have an extra 10K paying for parking, buying beer, merch, etc. I can't go tonight but I gave mine away to CoachCap and bought two more for some diehards on twitter.
Rutgers (B1G) and WSU (Pac 12) had fewer than 31,000. WF and ULM 26,505, Tulane and Tulsa 19,232, Temple and Vanderbilt 31,731, BSU and Ole Miss (SEC) 32,823. It's a nationwide problem, not a UConn problem. I'm sure we'll beat all of the aforementioned games in attendance.
Those empty seats aren't buying any food, beer or merchandise. Drop the price and raise attendance.
"Get people in the building and they'll spend more $." ~ Captain Obvious
UConn doesn't get concession or parking revenue though correct?
Think Uconn keeps the parking revenue after paying LAZ but no concessions. Also pay a flat rental fee per game. BTW I think roughly 1500 left. I need to stop taking vacation days on game day. Slightly obsessed here
UConn doesn't get concession or parking revenue though correct?
Did they do a "top of the rent" promo again? otherwise, I am wondering why there are no seats available at the top of the rent, but are (generally) about 6 rows down? I hope those aren't being held back or anything (which would be a much more barren building than the ticket website indicates).
But those teams don't need stellar attendance to survive. They're getting carried financially by their fellow members of a conference in which they have been grandfathered. UConn not only won't be taking a share of P5 money regardless of performance (i.e. Wake Forest), but also needs to break in to the P5.Rutgers (B1G) and WSU (Pac 12) had fewer than 31,000. WF and ULM 26,505, Tulane and Tulsa 19,232, Temple and Vanderbilt 31,731, BSU and Ole Miss (SEC) 32,823. It's a nationwide problem, not a UConn problem. I'm sure we'll beat all of the aforementioned games in attendance.
Agreed, except that just because it worked out, doesn't mean it was planned or played perfectly. I'm sure there were some elevated heart rates and systolic numbers in the Ticket Office yesterday. Based on the timing and how they released those tickets for sale, The Ticket Office was reacting to Twitter and the Boneyard as opposed to it being a planned action on their part.The prices aren't the issue. Timing is more of the issue. But maybe it isn't. If there's 40K in the stadium tonight, then the timing, pricing, and demand were all played perfectly. I could just do without the "31K tickets have been sold" heart attack 24 hours before kickoff!![]()
As of July 2011, the state gets 10% off the top of ticket sales. The vast majority goes to UConn and UConn pays Global Spectrum rent. GS then contracts with concession vendors, security and parking, of which a portion of their sales also goes to GS. Unless the arrangement changed last year, UConn does not get a concession commission.I think you're right. It goes to whoever is running the XL/Rent these days (can't keep track any more). Small portion to the state too, maybe??
SC had good attendance but I suspect that most of the attendees wished they hadn't gone.
Of course they would with an on campus stadium....UConn doesn't get concession or parking revenue though correct?
