Top all time WBBWhat are they ranking? College, Pro, International, combined?
So, NCAA players on their whole (college, pro, international) careers? Or just NCAA career?Top all time WBB
All those accolades are great. But that is not what sets her apart from everybody else. This does: “Between the NCAA Tournament, WNBA Playoffs, and the Olympics, DT’s played in 46 elimination games over the course of her basketball career; she hasn’t gone home 42 of those times. In total, Taurasi holds an overall record of 42-4, good enough for a staggering 91% win record.” (WNBA.com)I think Stewart is the top NCAA player ever, and could eventually be the top overall, but it's hard to see how the top all-time WNBA scorer (with three NCAA titles, three WNBA titles, and six Olympic gold medals) isn't number 1 right now.
Wow! That’s impressive!All those accolades are great. But that is not what sets her apart from everybody else. This does: “Between the NCAA Tournament, WNBA Playoffs, and the Olympics, DT’s played in 46 elimination games over the course of her basketball career; she hasn’t gone home 42 of those times. In total, Taurasi holds an overall record of 42-4, good enough for a staggering 91% win record.” (WNBA.com)
I agree. If we're talking about just college, it's hard to argue that 4 NCs is not #1. If we're talking about lifetime achievement, how could it not be DT? Someone's going to surpass 6 Olympic gold medals and everything else she has accomplished. I think not.If it’s just in NCAAW then Stewart should be #1 or at the very least top 3.
Your post makes so much sense it's shockingI think this”greatest player” thing is very subjective. Clearly, if you look at titles, then Stewie is #1, with Taurasi & Holdsclaw #2, & Maya and Candace probably tied at #3. However, if you look at indomitable, dogged winners, I would probably choose Dee. If you look at players who just played the game so beautifully that you were just mesmerized watching her, I would choose Paige & Maya. If you looked only at the ”clutch” gene, I would choose Dee & Paige. Scoring? Caitlin! Physical ability? Maya & Cheryl Miller! Leadership? Sue & Dee! You can go on and on with categories and of course, everyone is going to have different opinions on everything and then you also have the generational thing. It’s not like all the great players were limited to my (or anyone’s) lifespan!
Excellent perspective, Cuango, but I'll ask the question that should baffle everyone: if DT is the most 'indomitable, dogged winner,' why does she have just three WNBA titles in two decades. I've seen her play less than her best a number of times over the years as Phoenix would suffer elimination.I think this”greatest player” thing is very subjective. Clearly, if you look at titles, then Stewie is #1, with Taurasi & Holdsclaw #2, & Maya and Candace probably tied at #3. However, if you look at indomitable, dogged winners, I would probably choose Dee. If you look at players who just played the game so beautifully that you were just mesmerized watching her, I would choose Paige & Maya. If you looked only at the ”clutch” gene, I would choose Dee & Paige. Scoring? Caitlin! Physical ability? Maya & Cheryl Miller! Leadership? Sue & Dee! You can go on and on with categories and of course, everyone is going to have different opinions on everything and then you also have the generational thing. It’s not like all the great players were limited to my (or anyone’s) lifespan!
That DT was on the last two Olympics teams were gifts to her resume. She clearly wasn't deserving as one of the best players.I agree. If we're talking about just college, it's hard to argue that 4 NCs is not #1. If we're talking about lifetime achievement, how could it not be DT? Someone's going to surpass 6 Olympic gold medals and everything else she has accomplished. I think not.
Caitlin also had many more rebounds and assists than DT in their respective NCAA Final Four games. It might be that, in spite of all the BY posts to the contrary, DT had better supporting casts, and also played lesser opponents.Yes championships do matter, it matters when determining goat, Taurasi was in the same position Clark was in her jr and sr year and got it done. Yes Clark scored more but also shot it more and turned it over more. Doesn't discount Clark's greatness but if D turned it over as much she doesn't win it all in 2003 and 2004.
And more turnovers and more points scored on her. 2003 and 2004 UConn team weren't juggernaut teams. We're talking 3 championships here not 1 ok I'll be nice and leave out 2002 since it was a juggernaut team, Taurasi won back to back as the focal point.Caitlin also had many more rebounds and assists than DT in their respective NCAA Final Four games. It might be that, in spite of all the BY posts to the contrary, DT had better supporting casts, and also played lesser opponents.