C
Chief00
When I posted it awhile ago it was what he said at practice. Not sure what video you are referring too. You seem behind the curve on things.Those words came out of Randy's mouth. It's on video
When I posted it awhile ago it was what he said at practice. Not sure what video you are referring too. You seem behind the curve on things.Those words came out of Randy's mouth. It's on video
You just don't know what words mean. You said someone "implied" that the four man front was just to show the offense different looks. No one "implied" anything. Edsall said it on video from one of the hoardes interviews. Now, whether or not that was truthful is a different storyWhen I posted it awhile ago it was what he said at practice. Not sure what video you are referring too. You seem behind the curve on things.
If I have tonight - I will pull up the post that shows your clueless.You just don't know what words mean. You said someone "implied" that the four man front was just to show the offense different looks. No one "implied" anything. Edsall said it on video from one of the hoardes interviews. Now, whether or not that was truthful is a different story
You still don't understand what the word imply meansIf I have tonight - I will pull up the post that shows your clueless.
You just don't know what words mean. You said someone "implied" that the four man front was just to show the offense different looks. No one "implied" anything. Edsall said it on video from one of the hoardes interviews. Now, whether or not that was truthful is a different story
You still don't understand what the word imply means[/QUOTE
You will be proven wrong.
It's the first actual public SIGHTING of Crocker.
Our new tailgate theme song.That's what I'm hearing. It's balls to the walls.
I guess what Chief was seeing at various practices wasn’t preparing the offense for different looks as some implied.
Good to confirm the eye test still works - we are crowding receivers at the line and putting more guys in the box.
Apparently that's what the article is about.So it looks like the defense he actually ran at Villanova . . .
I wonder why he didn't run it that way last year?
Ok - I see what you are up in arms about. I know what Edsall said for public consumption. However, the reason I used the word implied is he will effectively be playing a 4 man front. It may be a 3 man line with a linebacker effectively playing a floating DE on the line of scrimmage or a 4 man DL line - the result is the same - stuffing the box on the run and having 4 or more guys rush the passer.
I’ve always been suspect of the 3-3-5 but now I get it. Crocker suffers from digital deficiency syndrome. He wraps up his practice with, “Huskies on two—1/2 /Huskies”. Looks like he’s a number short on the cheer and his D-line.
I hope they don't consider that "thinking outside the box"!Most of the coaches have been doing that...
Which is the same defense they used at times last year but w/ different (prayfully more effective) pieces this year. It’s no change other than player names.
Which is the same defense they used at times last year but w/ different (prayfully more effective) pieces this year. It’s no change other than player names.
It seemed to me and quite frankly others that Billy had trouble adjusting to the speed of skilled players in the AAC. Therefore, he effectively played prevent defense
I’ll say it one more time — his defenses at Villanova blitzed from all different angles and jammed receivers at the line. He got here and stopped doing it. Why did Crocker change from his scheme when he got here? Still waiting for an answer, and it should be an obvious one.