I really don’t like to dwell on how games are called. And I congratulate Dusty May and his team for doing what they had to do, playing good D and making their foul shots. And I’m the first one to admit I cringe watching Chief complain about foul calls game after game when anyone can see that much of the disparity is based on how we play.
But. Having said all that, with hundreds of Division 1 referees out there, how is it possible that in the national title game the NCAA can appoint a referee with a history with one of the two teams? Frankly, I’m shocked that a ref from either of the conferences in the final game would be allowed near the court? Wouldn’t you want 3 refs from neutral conferences, which doesn’t see either team all the time?
If anyone knows the thinking on that I’d love to hear it. Is it really totally based on grading and they don’t care if there’s a history between one of the refs and one of the teams? That just strikes me as literally crazy, and an issue that can be totally eliminated just by not letting a ref from either team’s conference on the court.
I’ll talk about the game tomorrow. Too upset right now. The game was there, we just didn’t hit enough shots to overcome Michigan and the refs. But man, if anyone criticizes the guts and heart of this team they can fight me first. Because sane people would have quit when everthing is against them and shots aren’t falling. And yet, we had a chance to win in the last 30 seconds.