junglehusky
Molotov Cocktail of Ugliness
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 7,157
- Reaction Score
- 15,475
I was thinking the same thing, but then BC must be in a bit of a pickle here. They can not be happy with his behavior/judgment re: the Globe article. Also, his on the job performance has been sub par (poor coaching decisions, declining athletics - save Hockey - in all BC primary sports, declining attendance, etc...). However, does BC decide they need to keep Flipper close until the ESPN business/ACC expansion calms down. Last thing BC and the ACC wants is Flipper on the street, pissed off at the world, and spouting his mouth off about everyhting he really knows about expansion, ESPN's direction to the ACC, etc... I'm sure if they term'd him he'd get a nice severance, with a caveat that he sign a NDA (non-disclosure agreement) tha would forfeit his severance if he discusses any BC/ACC business, but as he's proven before, he's got kind of a big mouth and bad judgment. He's more dangerous to BC and the ACC unemployed than he is employed. My sense is that GDF's "resignation" won't happen for a year or two.I'd bet DeFilippo will be out of work VERY soon judging from that hastliy released appology letter and the chatter on the BC boards.
As much as I thing Jacobs is a disgrace to the profession, he's absolutely nailed it in the articles he's wrote about the ACC/expansion.
Considering he uses the Courant to blatantly push his personal agendas, no, I don't think it is.Disgrace might be pushing it a little bit, no?
Overall Jacobs does a pretty good job IMO. Uconn fans don't just like it when he calls out our program on mistakes and we have had more than our share of problems. Jacobs was much more vocal, critical and biased on the Whalers leaving way past the point when anyone else cared.Considering he uses the Courant to blatantly push his personal agendas, no, I don't think it is.
Good call. Even if I don't always agree, you need a gadfly of the state...Overall Jacobs does a pretty good job IMO. Uconn fans don't just like it when he calls out our program on mistakes and we have had more than our share of problems. Jacobs was much more vocal, critical and biased on the Whalers leaving way past the point when anyone else cared.
The fact that he and JC are not exactly buddies is a probably a good thing. We get enough rose colored information from Uconn people and whether or not you agree with Jacobs, he provides a diffferent perspective.
It's not that he calls out Calhoun/UConn - I think that's a good thing (and wish more of the local writers would have the stones to do it, at least on occasion).Overall Jacobs does a pretty good job IMO. Uconn fans don't just like it when he calls out our program on mistakes and we have had more than our share of problems. Jacobs was much more vocal, critical and biased on the Whalers leaving way past the point when anyone else cared.
The fact that he and JC are not exactly buddies is a probably a good thing. We get enough rose colored information from Uconn people and whether or not you agree with Jacobs, he provides a diffferent perspective.
Overall Jacobs does a pretty good job IMO. Uconn fans don't just like it when he calls out our program on mistakes and we have had more than our share of problems. Jacobs was much more vocal, critical and biased on the Whalers leaving way past the point when anyone else cared.
The fact that he and JC are not exactly buddies is a probably a good thing. We get enough rose colored information from Uconn people and whether or not you agree with Jacobs, he provides a diffferent perspective.