pay wall
The Courant requested documents "from Jan. 1, 2016 to the present." Is this an error? Why didn't they request documents from Jan.1 2015 to the present"?
This does not make sense to me.
It's because the Courant is complicit with UConn administration not to look where they are not supposed to look.
The article mentions that K State president met with Herbst in November. Why wouldn't they ask to go back three more months to see if there was any electronic communication that corresponded with a physical meeting?
The Courant requested documents "from Jan. 1, 2016 to the present." Is this an error? Why didn't they request documents from Jan.1 2015 to the present"?
This does not make sense to me.
pay wall
UCONN has done the conference realignment scene quietly since the ACC debacle. While we are all emotionally invested as fans, we need to let the professionals do their job. We aren't privvy to behind the scenes conversations and maybe we shouldn't be. People pounding their chest for FOI need to take a step back and ask- why do I need to know? What will that do to the outcome?
If Cinnci does not get into the Big 12, what will happen to Santa Ono? He will look like the biggest buffoon in the room of buffoons. I like UCONN's approach - quiet and hopefully effective.
Out of curiosity, what would happen if an institution doesn't end up releasing everything they are supposed to after a FOI is filed? Is it a financial slap on the wrist or worse? Just curious because if it's not the end of the world, I don't see why they'd release things they know will get them in hot water with whatever conference they may be negotiating or speaking with.
Yea seems like that must be a typo
Unless it's an elaborate ruse and Jeff Jacobs is in on it!
Out of curiosity, what would happen if an institution doesn't end up releasing everything they are supposed to after a FOI is filed? Is it a financial slap on the wrist or worse? Just curious because if it's not the end of the world, I don't see why they'd release things they know will get them in hot water with whatever conference they may be negotiating or speaking with.
Jacobs: "Obviously, the school is not communicating about realignment via official email, etc. Yet only a fool would believe UConn hasn't engaged the Big 12 and other conferences in some other ways."
Boneyard: "Pina Coladas and donuts"
The Courant requested documents "from Jan. 1, 2016 to the present." Is this an error? Why didn't they request documents from Jan.1 2015 to the present"?
This does not make sense to me.
Either the story is incorrect regarding the date or the Courant isn't trying too hard.
Tell the truth, Jeff Jacobs. Calling you out.
Yea seems like that must be a typo
Unless it's an elaborate ruse and Jeff Jacobs is in on it!
It says right in the article that the FOI request was for a "relatively short amount of time" but that it was a "key period going into Big 12 meetings".I keep going back to the online story to see if they changed the date.
Look, I'm not saying that I agree with an FOI request. But to write an entire story based on the fact that the Courant didn't get anything, when they used a date of January 1, 2016, does not make sense.
It says right in the article that the FOI request was for a "relatively short amount of time" but that it was a "key period going into Big 12 meetings".
It's not a typo.
I don't think it was a mistake that the request was for such a short time window.Was that in the original story? I missed it.
Jeff Jacobs says: "The in-depth Enquirer story this week gave some fascinating insight into things Cincinnati and its president, Santa Ono, have done to impress the Big 12. "
And because the Courant used a date of January 1, 2016, we didn't get a story with fascinating insights.
Santa Ono's twitter is Dad-level cringeworthy. He should take notes from Shulz.I'm quite glad Herbst isn't running around posting on Twitter like a 15-year-old about how awesome every restaurant in Austin is and taking selfies with Big 12 hobnobbers.