- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 9,374
- Reaction Score
- 23,661
This is the first time I can ever recall posting my extensive thoughts on a game before it was over, but I'm frustrated right now to an extent where I can't keep it bottled up any longer. This is coaching malpractice and the current product is p***ing on Calhoun's legacy. Let's start with the simple stuff.
- HOW MANY GAMES OF EVIDENCE DO WE NEED BEFORE WE STOP STARTING FACEY AND BRIMAH IN THE SAME FRONT COURT.
- FACEY SHOULD NEVER PLAY THE FOUR, EVER. And if he does, at least don't match him up with Brooks.
- Why doesn't Durham get more time? He's better than Facey and Enoch.
I know we have injuries. I know Ollie wanted to start a big lineup because we're incredibly thin in the backcourt. But we still have more than enough to win, and more than more than enough to play them competitively. The depth is not an excuse when I watched Syracuse go to the final four last year with basically six players.
Looks like they're playing better now, which was not unexpected when I started this thread. Same pattern for three years now. He has got to figure out how to manage games better.
- HOW MANY GAMES OF EVIDENCE DO WE NEED BEFORE WE STOP STARTING FACEY AND BRIMAH IN THE SAME FRONT COURT.
- FACEY SHOULD NEVER PLAY THE FOUR, EVER. And if he does, at least don't match him up with Brooks.
- Why doesn't Durham get more time? He's better than Facey and Enoch.
I know we have injuries. I know Ollie wanted to start a big lineup because we're incredibly thin in the backcourt. But we still have more than enough to win, and more than more than enough to play them competitively. The depth is not an excuse when I watched Syracuse go to the final four last year with basically six players.
Looks like they're playing better now, which was not unexpected when I started this thread. Same pattern for three years now. He has got to figure out how to manage games better.