this has been bugging me for years, mostly because of deserving teams getting hosed for years. i like to think that there is a reason for most things, so im likely to wonder when i don't get something. going back to basics, i just took a look at the big ten conference wiki, and the very first sentence of the men's basketballEVERY year the NCCA committee salivate over the big 10. Why???????? There last champion was Michigan State in 2000 and before that it was Michigan in 1989. Sadly I don't think it will ever change. They will always have at minimum of 6 competing in the dance.
Thought you said Clingan and I almost had a heart attack.Clinging to Michigan. Imagine if Michigan lost. Yikes.
Stop. The old Big East never performed this badly. The Big Ten hasn’t won a ship in 20 years and the tv networks continuously parade them as the best conference. Absolutely overrated, not even debatable anymoreLol. You guys are funny. The big 10 fell into the same situation like the big east that sent 11 teams and got bounced just as fast. Thank God Uconn won it all that year.
Goliath gets slayed often during this time. The big boys and their young all Americans get bounced by the loaded mid major senior loaded teams.
Makes our USC win look shinyThis makes me even more sad that we couldn't take out the mediocre Maryland team.
You must be very young or very forgetful. Big East sent 11 team which was the most of any conference to-date. Only Uconn and Marquette made the Sweet 16.Stop. The old Big East never performed this badly. The Big Ten hasn’t won a ship in 20 years and the tv networks continuously parade them as the best conference. Absolutely overrated, not even debatable anymore
2 > 1. Just ask Tyler Olander.You must be very young or very forgetful. Big East sent 11 team which was the most of any conference to-date. Only Uconn and Marquette made the Sweet 16.
I can still hear Charles Barkley calling us the Big Least. Thank God Uconn won it all!
You realize that is still better than the Big 10, right?You must be very young or very forgetful. Big East sent 11 team which was the most of any conference to-date. Only Uconn and Marquette made the Sweet 16.
I can still hear Charles Barkley calling us the Big Least. Thank God Uconn won it all!
I can't speak for everyone on the board, but I think the issue with the Big 10 isn't that they got 9 teams in (agreed that whoever replaces teams like Rutgers, Michigan St, Maryland or Wisconsin wouldn't be world beaters themselves) but it's the fact that the media hyped them up all year as this legendary unbeatable conference who was way over-seeded and came up short on the biggest stage.Overrated? Yes, especially when it comes to seeding. But can somebody point to any teams that should have been selected to field over some of the Big 10 teams? I think the correct teams probably got in but the seeding was definitely way off.
I can't speak for everyone on the board, but I think the issue with the Big 10 isn't that they got 9 teams in (agreed that whoever replaces teams like Rutgers, Michigan St, Maryland or Wisconsin wouldn't be world beaters themselves) but it's the fact that the media hyped them up all year as this legendary unbeatable conference who was way over-seeded and came up short on the biggest stage.
If anything, the Big 10 in March should be an "underdog" story like Gonzaga, seeing how they haven't won a title in 20 years. But instead, every year the bobble heads on TV take about them like they are on the same level as the ACC or OBE.
attendance makes sense because other than Northwestern they are all large state flagship U's where the winters are cold. Compare that to the ACC where it has 4 programs in NC alone plus a dreg like BCU. These conferences are making big bucks with their television deals so of course the media are going to pump them up. 9 teams though. There needs to be an investigation!this has been bugging me for years, mostly because of deserving teams getting hosed for years. i like to think that there is a reason for most things, so im likely to wonder when i don't get something. going back to basics, i just took a look at the big ten conference wiki, and the very first sentence of the men's basketball
section is;
'The Big Ten has participated in basketball since 1904, and has led the nation in attendance every season since 1978.' (emphasis added)
it's very popular, the most popular live conference game going. i didn't know that, and if the all mighty selection group reflects this truth in their picks, it's at least something. not that much, but at least something to look at, for an answer.
still a lot of better teams getting hosed tho.
Big Ten Conference - Wikipedia
now that, as usual, rankings/ratings/pompoms and netbombs, have been mostly used to screw over soo many non-bigbutt teams, take a look at the 'net' list, and honestly ask 'how many on this bogus list should have been given a chance, but for this bogus list?' start at oral roberts, #158, and work backwards. having seen some of these abused squads, and then adding in appreciation for some others very good record, i count more than a few that should have had a chance.Overrated? Yes, especially when it comes to seeding. But can somebody point to any teams that should have been selected to field over some of the Big 10 teams? I think the correct teams probably got in but the seeding was definitely way off.
You can't include the additional information fairly because OOC playing was hampered. The point is the Big 10 loosing doesn't mean a conference was/is overrated. George mason would not have won a series against Uconn.2 > 1. Just ask Tyler Olander.
Big East also had 4 teams play each other in the round of 32, meaning 2 automatically couldn't advance.
In the non-conference that year, the Big East had OOC wins over top 4 seeds: Kentucky (twice), Texas (twice), Wisconsin and Duke.
This year, the Big 10 hasn't beat a non-conference opponent better than a 7 seed. 2 wins vs Clemson, 2 vs UNC, UConn, Loyola and LSU. That's it. That's their resume. Terrible.
The Big 10 is wildly overrated by the media, this year and every year.