Ended the year at #76 Massey combined rankings. BE play this year has been, similar to last year, at best in the lowest reaches of AQ conferences. hard to spit out, but ACC is probably better this year.
This is a 6-6 BE team with a little game luck get to 8-4 (see last year, WV turnovers only 6 and season changes, no two 50 yard FG's against USF and season changes) or some flub ups (fumble WM, Vandy pass and season changes to no bowl) get to 5-7.
At some point talent and depth of players and coaches comes into play. Wisc. ends up 11-2 and really could have been 13-0. USF went 5-7 and lost FOUR games by exactly 3 points and one by six. USF team could have been 8-4 with couple of plays. Sometimes luck, few bad calls, coaching 'yarders, all get you; where in another year you win those games in spite of it (or other teams have the 'yarders). So Uconn is performing around the median of being a 6-6 team which is not so surprising to me given the conference teams and Uconn talent level; put Uconn in the SEC West in place of Miss. and 0-8 in conference would be a possiblity.
Need better players. Who on Uconn's 22 one deep would start for #1 LSU (or for them make their scholarship team), start for #10 Arkansas or #20 Nebraska.
Not high on coaching staff, consider it waste of time starting JMac all 12 games and never giving MN a real run, talk by coaches of using Williams after 10 games or so "more as a receiver as he is a playmaker" was clueless, Sio still covering slot receivers into the Cin game just can't be done as Cin#6 proved numerous times.
Most important is getting better players and depth. Can't have one CB get hurt and curtails the whole defensive scheme as can't cover man to man, can't have an immobile QB, only one RB and that as undersized kid who has to play like superman to take all those carries and not get hurt.
No one is on Depaul's case in basketball 'cause they aren't competing for conference title, while for Uconn that would be an issue this year- why - roster talent.