CamrnCrz1974
Good Guy for a Dookie
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 2,049
- Reaction Score
- 11,980
I do not want to hear anyone accuse Phoenix of tanking to get Griner, as this is clearly part of the #TankForStewie campaign...
Putting the sexual harassment lawsuit aside for a moment, this is a really, really, really bad decision.Just Announced via twitter
Sarah Spain Questioning move.
Isiah Thomas, he of the '07 sexual harassment lawsuit that cost the Knicks $11mil, named president/part owner of the WNBA's NY Liberty. Huh.
It could not be summed up better than this statement.Putting the sexual harassment lawsuit aside for a moment, this is a really, really, really bad decision.
Let me see if I undrstand you correctly. To get rid of Thomas you would dissolve the Liberty Fanchise? Why? What WNBA issues remain "unvetted" with regards to Pokey Chapman being a WNBA coach. She has been a head coach and general manager since October 29, 2010!Simple solution---if you can't fire Isiah, assuming he deserves firing, then dissolve the Liberty Franchise and do a better job of Vetting all the coaches including Pokey Chapman and executives in both NBA and the WNBA!!
If Pokey's inappropriate relationship with a former player at LSU a few years ago is not a "WNBA" issue, then why is Isiah's sexual harassment of a fellow Knicks executive a few years ago a "WNBA" issue?Let me see if I undrstand you correctly. To get rid of Thomas you would dissolve the Liberty Fanchise? Why? What WNBA issues remain "unvetted" with regards to Pokey Chapman being a WNBA coach. She has been a head coach and general manager since October 29, 2010!
If Pokey's inappropriate relationship with a former player at LSU a few years ago is not a "WNBA" issue, then why is Isiah's sexual harassment of a fellow Knicks executive a few years ago a "WNBA" issue?
Not against the law, but "inappropriate enough - especially in a coaching situation -to get her fired from LSU. Isiah was not convicted of anything (civil suit). Don't get me wrong - I think he's low-life creep. But I don't understand why the WBB world was so hush about Pokey coming back to coaching.An "inappropriate relationship" is not against the law, "sexual harassment" is.
Not against the law, but "inappropriate enough - especially in a coaching situation -to get her fired from LSU. Isiah was not convicted of anything (civil suit). Don't get me wrong - I think he's low-life creep. But I don't understand why the WBB world was so hush about Pokey coming back to coaching.
Oh yeah - sorry, got my priorities mixed up there for a minute....Maybe Pokey has had some professional success, Thomas has been a failure everywhere he's been?
Oh yeah - sorry, got my priorities mixed up there for a minute....
Bolt the chairs down!If Bobby Knight came out of retirement and was selected instead of Thomas, what do you think the reaction would be like?
Because Pokey's inappropriate relationship with her former player at LSU WAS an WNBA issue & WAS vetted in 2010 before she became a WNBA GM and coach. Isaiah Thomas is ABOUT to become president of a WNBA franchise. Thomas' sexual harrassment issue IS/SHOULD be part of that vetting process today.If Pokey's inappropriate relationship with a former player at LSU a few years ago is not a "WNBA" issue, then why is Isiah's sexual harassment of a fellow Knicks executive a few years ago a "WNBA" issue?
You are splitting the hairs too finely IMO. Pokey actually resigned from LSU-Tchnically not fired. Although Isiah was "not convicted" the civil award was $11Mil. Even the dumbest juries & judges do not award that much without some indication of wrondoing. Both were involved in reprehensible behavior IMO. The WNBA was not Hush Hush about Pokey's situation at LSU upon her hiring in 2010 as you indicate. There was plenty of scrutinity heightened by the speculation that the player with who Pokey had the relationship was herself in the WNBA. Pokey has been GM and Coach in WNBA for 5 years now, at what point does the 2007 LSU incident stop reflecting on her ability to coach in the WNBA today?Not against the law, but "inappropriate enough - especially in a coaching situation -to get her fired from LSU. Isiah was not convicted of anything (civil suit). Don't get me wrong - I think he's low-life creep. But I don't understand why the WBB world was so hush about Pokey coming back to coaching.
"Hey, just come out and enjoy the games. Come out and watch."What can I say, I'm cranky: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/07/s...ire-as-an-insult-to-wnba-fans.html?ref=sports
No time soon, apparently. I'm not the one who brought up Pokey in this thread, but she seems to be getting plenty of discussion here, which might indicate that discussion is apropos to the Liberty/Thomas situation regardless of how long ago her inappropriate and unprofessional behavior was.The WNBA was not Hush Hush about Pokey's situation at LSU upon her hiring in 2010 as you indicate. There was plenty of scrutinity heightened by the speculation that the player with who Pokey had the relationship was herself in the WNBA. Pokey has been GM and Coach in WNBA for 5 years now, at what point does the 2007 LSU incident stop reflecting on her ability to coach in the WNBA today?
BroadwayVA suggested a vetting of Pokey and all WNBA coaches, you implied agreement. You don't vet someone for a job 5 years after they have been in the Job IMO. I'm not taking a position on Pokey being right or wrong more common sense.No time soon, apparently. I'm not the one who brought up Pokey in this thread, but she seems to be getting plenty of discussion here, which might indicate that discussion is apropos to the Liberty/Thomas situation regardless of how long ago her inappropriate and unprofessional behavior was.
Because Pokey, so far as is known, didn't "harass" someone, she (reportedly) had an inappropriate relationship, given that she was the coach and the other a player. Same as a professor and a student, or, in my opinion, a boss and a worker. It isn't illegal, LSU actually had no policy against it even though they didn't condone it (I hope they do now), and it was never investigated to "prove anything" because it wasn't a crime. Like any other black mark on a resume, it would be considered when hiring, and for all we know there were special clauses in her contract to ensure she didn't do likewise with a player on her pro team. The WNBA's concern would most likely be that they needed to be convinced that it wasn't going to re-occur. I'll add that my wife was my employee and she wanted to date me (her idea) enough that she quit her job so that I would go out with her. I felt there was a line there that I wouldn't cross - but was it illegal if I had - no. Was it against company policy - yes.If Pokey's inappropriate relationship with a former player at LSU a few years ago is not a "WNBA" issue, then why is Isiah's sexual harassment of a fellow Knicks executive a few years ago a "WNBA" issue?