- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 451
- Reaction Score
- 1,066
As a UCONN fan, I've almost forgotten what it's like to have a pass-first point guard.If the kid dishes out 10 assists per game and averages 4 points, I'm alright with that.
As a UCONN fan, I've almost forgotten what it's like to have a pass-first point guard.If the kid dishes out 10 assists per game and averages 4 points, I'm alright with that.
As a UCONN fan, I've almost forgotten what it's like to have a pass-first point guard.
As a UCONN fan, I've almost forgotten what it's like to have a pass-first point guard.
This kid sounds like a Donnell Beverly, with upside maybe as high as Craig Austrie.
Either way, he's a nice 4th guard, but if he's being counted on for major minutes at PG in 2014 (or, God-forbid, next year), then we're in big trouble and Ollie will have failed spectacularly as a recruiter.
"we're in big trouble and Ollie will have failed spectacularly as a recruiter."
people starting early for the mushroom cap comment of the year comment, i see!!
This kid sounds like a Donnell Beverly, with upside maybe as high as Craig Austrie.
Either way, he's a nice 4th guard, but if he's being counted on for major minutes at PG in 2014 (or, God-forbid, next year), then we're in big trouble and Ollie will have failed spectacularly as a recruiter.
Have you seen him play? The kid is a very good athlete. Much more than Beverly and Austrie. For heaven's sake, watch video! And "Ollie will have failed spectacularly" as a recruiter? Why? In case you didn't notice, Ollie got a contract a week ago. If, as you say, he needs to rely on Samuel next year because Bazz and/or Boatright leave, you're going to call that a spectacular failure?
Samuel is a player. He might not score 20 a game, but he can really run a game. Trust me.
I hope you're right. Unless we land a stud at PG or elsewhere in the 2014 class, we'll be counting on him to be the next great UConn point guard. That's a tall order. Here's what I mean:
- If we don't get a stud wing or big man, we'll continue to be a PG-oriented offense, where we're counting on our ballhandlers to do the vast majority of the scoring, a la Kemba, Bazz, Boat; Samuel can't be that guy
- If we do get some stud wings or big men, we can run a more balanced offense, with the PG as a distributor, a la Ricky or Taliek; Samuel might be able to fulfill this role
Who knows, maybe OC or DD can blossom into that scoring wing role in a few years and take pressure off the point guard to do everything. My point is simply that Samuel is inadequate for the scoring-point-guard role that our offense has adopted the last 3-4 years, and unless we score some major recruiting victories at other positions or bring in a stud PG to play alongside Samuel, we're going to have problems.
Marcus Williams kinda was.
Not making any predictions about how good he'll be, but he's a significantly better athlete than both the guys you mentioned. And his playing style is almost the polar opposite of Austrie.This kid sounds like a Donnell Beverly, with upside maybe as high as Craig Austrie.
i assume this is tongue-in-cheek, but can never be sure on the internet
He didn't play much, foul trouble.How many assists did Samuel have?
Not the most well thought out comment. Having a bad day?This kid sounds like a Donnell Beverly, with upside maybe as high as Craig Austrie.
Either way, he's a nice 4th guard, but if he's being counted on for major minutes at PG in 2014 (or, God-forbid, next year), then we're in big trouble and Ollie will have failed spectacularly as a recruiter.
Not the most well thought out comment. Having a bad day?
I've heard from someone who has an eye for talent who has seen Samuel play more than once describe him as a reach for UConn. With that said you have to be careful not to draw a conclusion one way or the other after watching a recruit play one or two games.
There may be a valid reason he was just a 3-star recruit he committed to UConn. I hope he has a lot of upside and untapped talent, but scoring just one point in a rivalry game where his team needed him to score is not a good sign.
Eh, not one of my finer. But I don't think the idea behind it was terribly out of touch with the other Samuel skeptics in this thread.
Put simply, that is horribleTS stats up until the end of the 3rd
FG: 0-0
FT: 1-2
1 pt
1 rb
2 assissts
2 steal
1 TO