The Funster
What?
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 2,949
- Reaction Score
- 8,647
UConn is walking a thin line here. I think the plan is for BD to come back but there may be second thoughts due to the negative feedback about STs for next year.
UConn is walking a thin line here. I think the plan is for BD to come back but there may be second thoughts due to the negative feedback about STs for next year.
UConn is walking a thin line here. I think the plan is for BD to come back but there may be second thoughts due to the negative feedback about STs for next year.
I can tell you that under Edsall the Assistant's worked on a contract that went year to year and any bowl games that put them over were considered carry-over from the contract they were working off of and covered under those terms. I'' not sure if things have changed since then though.So this thread has raised a question in my mind. Is it typical for football coaches' contracts to end with the calendar year? Given the bad coincidence with a crucial time in the recruiting cycle, would it make more sense for a HC's contract to end shortly after the regular season? There doesn't seem to be a need to accommodate bowl games; most coaches making bowls aren't getting fired.
And by "negative feedback" you mean "potential armageddon?"
I'm not even sure what my decision would be on renewing if I was asked today. I don't mind losing and I don't mind rebuilding but there needs to be some hope as to where we're going at least. And at the moment, I just don't feel hopeful.
So this thread has raised a question in my mind. Is it typical for football coaches' contracts to end with the calendar year? Given the bad coincidence with a crucial time in the recruiting cycle, would it make more sense for a HC's contract to end shortly after the regular season? There doesn't seem to be a need to accommodate bowl games; most coaches making bowls aren't getting fired.
So this thread has raised a question in my mind. Is it typical for football coaches' contracts to end with the calendar year? Given the bad coincidence with a crucial time in the recruiting cycle, would it make more sense for a HC's contract to end shortly after the regular season? There doesn't seem to be a need to accommodate bowl games; most coaches making bowls aren't getting fired.
I will lead your victory parade if you are right.Listen you have to admit you'd be thrilled.
So this thread has raised a question in my mind. Is it typical for football coaches' contracts to end with the calendar year
If Paul Pasqualoni and George DeLeone can still get jobs....Benedict needs to select the OC. He needs to be somebody that Benedict would be comfortable giving the HC job too. It's an extremely difficult situation for all, but I'm not of the opinion we can't find an OC willing to take on the challenge.
Success isn't guaranteed, it's common for OCs only last 1-3 years (successful or not). If I'm an OC who is confident that I have the support of my AD, I accept the challenge. If you don't perform as an OC you're looking at 1-2 years before you're replaced anyway. If you do perform well you're setting yourself up for the next opportunity, whether it's at UConn or elsewhere. We basically have the worst offense in the country, if you can come in and make us even average, that's going to look good on a resume.
Burning his Red Short might turn out to be the best thing that happened. It dispelled the hype and exposed the fact we need to go find a franchise QB. DW is not even remotely the guy and showed little ability to move the needle. There is no natural superstar there either in the air or on the ground. I'm not talking abut DW being great out of the box, but saw very few, if any, flashes of brilliance. He lacks foot quickness, is not a naturally deceptive runner, his field vision is atrocious and his accuracy is very poor. Can he improve? Of course he can. Is he an obvious big impact player with raw talent that compensates for inexperience? Not even close from what I see. DW is a Diaco hype product.Benedict has to fire him Jan 1st. If he is not allowed to do so (unlikely) , I believe scores of players will transfer and we will have decommits from many recruits. My educated guess tells me SH knows just as well as DB what's at stake here, and has gotten the blessing of the BOT to do what's necessary. I'd be shocked if DB has not already had discreet informal conversations with some coaching candidates. Losing to Tulane like we did was bad enough but burning Williams redshirt was huge.
The Verducci announcement that he was moving into a new position next year and not being dumped into Long Island Sound killed any day dreams I had about Diaco not surviving this.
I can tell you that under Edsall the Assistant's worked on a contract that went year to year and any bowl games that put them over were considered carry-over from the contract they were working off of and covered under those terms. I'' not sure if things have changed since then though.
yeah not happeningOr the optimistic view is that BD is pretty sure he is going to be cut loose after the New Year. So why fire his long time buddy and friend, only to be fired himself a month later? Just "reassign" him to another position for a month to spare him the "has been fired" label on his resume if BD is on the same life boat off the Titanic anyway.
One can hope anyway.