RedStickHusky
formerly SeoulHuskyFan
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 4,591
- Reaction Score
- 18,218
Chap, since you put such effort into producing a very nearly coherent post, I feel you deserve a reply.Gentlemen: The revenue issue is the acid test for intercollegiate sports success.
Many casual fans think it is victories, but they just do not know jackson.
UCONN sledteam in foosbal generated 11.1mil in '13 according to Hartford business analysts in economic development corporations. These are serious decision-makers.
They do not utilize buddy system headhunters.
They do not play one subsidiary vs another.
They are not in Paris when the heavy hitters are in the batting circle.
They nurture success with dedicated work with a plan in place with short term, near term and long term goals with supporting objectives and enabling objectives, all of which are measureable in dollar and aesthetic terms.
Organizations like the Orange of Syracuse University and the Eagles of Boston College produced 2013 foosbal revenue in the 30-35mil range in their markets. If consensus is that the sledteam market has similar potential, then guess who needs to hit these numbers for P5 future growth path?
- We all know the money is important for many reasons, but it is not what we root for. We need the money to stay competitive, but it is not the ultimate objective. You say "casual fan" but I think 99% feel that way.
- You say someone has to hit P5 income levels to put us on a P5 path, but I think that's backwards. Not that winning had anything to with Syr or BCU hitting the lottery, but we clearly need to redefine the perceptions of our program - and we have to do it without P5 money. A lot has been written here about the sustainability of that gap and, yes, it's on WM to find alternative sources but that's not a question I'm going to peruse with the same interest I give to a box score.