oldude
bamboo lover
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2016
- Messages
- 17,228
- Reaction Score
- 153,998
While we don’t always know the justification for a waiver request, and that certainly adds to our confusion relative to whether or not a waiver is granted or not, an article recently published in the Oregonian, with an interview of Sedona Prince, pretty clearly outlines her stated reasons for the waiver.
Prince’s basic argument is that she didn’t feel “safe” with the medical staff at TX, particularly after her 2nd surgery in NY this past spring. Prince maintains that the TX medical staff and trainers basically left her on her own for visits to the doctor, rehab, etc. She went on to say that she felt alone during the process, only accompanied at times by her mother. This is a somewhat unique argument, not necessarily claiming malpractice, but simply indifference.
As I read the article on Prince, I could only wonder if the NCAA views the Prince situation in the same light as Evina’s. While no one has publicly stated the reasons behind Evina’s waiver request, there has certainly been speculation that it involves issues surrounding her knee injury, possibly playing on it when she shouldn’t and mistreatment by the LV medical staff.
The difference is that Prince appeared to be under the care of an outside physician, at least after the 2nd surgery, while Evina appears to have been dealing directly with the LV medical staff. From the NCAA’s perspective, I don’t know if that is a distinction without a difference.
There is one other difference between the two players. Kelly Graves has indicated that Prince is still limited in practice. He hopes to have her fully available for the start of conference play in January. As far as I know, Evina could play tomorrow if the NCAA granted her waiver.
Prince’s basic argument is that she didn’t feel “safe” with the medical staff at TX, particularly after her 2nd surgery in NY this past spring. Prince maintains that the TX medical staff and trainers basically left her on her own for visits to the doctor, rehab, etc. She went on to say that she felt alone during the process, only accompanied at times by her mother. This is a somewhat unique argument, not necessarily claiming malpractice, but simply indifference.
As I read the article on Prince, I could only wonder if the NCAA views the Prince situation in the same light as Evina’s. While no one has publicly stated the reasons behind Evina’s waiver request, there has certainly been speculation that it involves issues surrounding her knee injury, possibly playing on it when she shouldn’t and mistreatment by the LV medical staff.
The difference is that Prince appeared to be under the care of an outside physician, at least after the 2nd surgery, while Evina appears to have been dealing directly with the LV medical staff. From the NCAA’s perspective, I don’t know if that is a distinction without a difference.
There is one other difference between the two players. Kelly Graves has indicated that Prince is still limited in practice. He hopes to have her fully available for the start of conference play in January. As far as I know, Evina could play tomorrow if the NCAA granted her waiver.