UCFBfan
We're going bowling!
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2012
- Messages
- 6,058
- Reaction Score
- 12,947
Came across this article on CollegeFootballNews and found it interesting.
http://cfn.scout.com/2/1159943.html
In the article it broke down the participants and what they were ranked coming into college. They found that around 10% were "off the grid" or went alternate routes. Another 92 were 2 star recruits. Another 87 were 3 star. more than half of the participants were 3 star or lower.
I know everyone wants to see 4 or 5 star recruits coming into this program but I think these numbers show that these rankings are all over the place and inaccurate. Am I saying 4 or 5 star recruits aren't great, no. But you can still be highly successful with 2 or 3 star talent. UConn does this each year.
One final thing. The first part of this article stated that CT is one of 9 states not sending an athlete to the combine. They said last year 5 went. CT was the surprise state with a donut for combine participants. (This isn't UConn, but the state of CT as hometowns).
http://cfn.scout.com/2/1159943.html
In the article it broke down the participants and what they were ranked coming into college. They found that around 10% were "off the grid" or went alternate routes. Another 92 were 2 star recruits. Another 87 were 3 star. more than half of the participants were 3 star or lower.
I know everyone wants to see 4 or 5 star recruits coming into this program but I think these numbers show that these rankings are all over the place and inaccurate. Am I saying 4 or 5 star recruits aren't great, no. But you can still be highly successful with 2 or 3 star talent. UConn does this each year.
One final thing. The first part of this article stated that CT is one of 9 states not sending an athlete to the combine. They said last year 5 went. CT was the surprise state with a donut for combine participants. (This isn't UConn, but the state of CT as hometowns).