- Joined
- Sep 15, 2011
- Messages
- 1,774
- Reaction Score
- 1,381
Bottom line is.
UCFB(-BD+FHCRE) =
@PAWSARF
UCFB(-BD+FHCRE) =
@PAWSARF
@PAWSARFConsidering how severely hamstrung DB was, this was actually a reasonable outcome. Another year of Diaco, being fully aware that Diaco was not about to accept advice from a quality offensive mind would have been a bigger disaster than anything we've seen to date (not that we had been strangers to disastrous football seasons recently).
A beat down on Holy Cross? How small time of you and your "liked" friends. A beat down on Missouri and BC next season and I'll be ok with Edsall.
That's not demonstrably false. It screams small time far, far less than keeping a coach who failed as miserably as Diaco (or P before him) would have. Now please go away.
We are a tough sale right now for a quality guy. We are a G5 program, in a poor recruiting area, with a smallish stadium a half hour away from campus that hasn't had a winning season in 6 years. We weren't going to hit a home run with this hire. Randy gets a runner a base and winning seasons advance the runner. We are getting his services dirt cheap in a time that we are tight on funds. The more I think about it the more I realize this was a smart hire by Benedict, if not an exciting one. After a few seasons of competent football we can revisit whether we need a upgrade, but job 1 is stopping the bleeding, and Randy does that.
Not sure why there ARE admissions standards for football players. Are they not an anachronism? This is entertainment purely and simply and college ball is simply a farm league for the pros. If they want an education, let them get one for free. If they don't, why even force them to go to class or live on campus?Hopefully, the admissions standards will be loosened up a bit.