I suspect he'll be known to the public as the greatest singer of Nessun Dorma the bball world will
ever know, while chugging a glass of his own wine.
Remember the last line of the aria is "I shall win". Gurgle, gurgle.
It's tricky enough to compare coaches' achievements in different sports but becomes unreasonable to factor in the differences in eras, given all of the variations that must be addressed.
Take men's college basketball, for example. Wooden had a great run at UCLA, but he had several years of only moderate success before he really got rolling and he was not confronted with the challenges faced later by other great HoF coaches. For one thing, it was relatively easy for UCLA to get to the Final Four back then and he had the luxury of keeping Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (nee Lew Alcindor) and Bill Walton for four years apiece. He also benefited from the generosity of a booster named Sam Gilbert. Coaches named Smith and Knight and Kryzyzewski and Calhoun have had a tougher row to hoe.
Similarly, although Pat Summitt set the bar high during her glorious tenure at Tennessee, for many of her early years she had an easier path to victories and championships than Geno has faced -- and overcome.
So let's just try to focus on "best coaches" of various sports for now.
For starters, Anson Dorrance jumps to the top of women's college soccer coaches with 29 NCAA championships (plus three runners-up) since 1982. Add Dan Gable, who coached 16 NCAA Championships in college wrestling at Iowa from 1976 to 1987.
Now, to answer the question posed by the OP, here are some reasonable goals/milestones that Geno could possibly attain:
A thousand victories during the 2016-2017 season. Eleven hundred by 2020.
A ninth NC soon (2014?) and eleven or more before 2020.
Should Geno sustain his health and personal drive, these achievements would set him apart, like Dorrance and Gable, as supreme in his profession.
I believe he can do it. And I am among many who will pull for him every step along the way, from his current mere legendary status to ultimate immortality.
And Pat is still a HeadThere's something odd about aspiring to be the GOAT.
But she is no longer the summit.And Pat is still a Head
- Geno emphasizes passing. while Odie never stops dribbling.Comparisons are odious.
We know Geno won all the NCAA finals he has been in. But he does have a string of loss in semi-finals. Does he also hold the record in most semi-final loss while PS has the most final loss?Pat is 8-5 in NCAA Championship games.
She also has two runner-up finishes in the AIAW Championships, in 1980 and 1981. (The media guide says ten runner-up finishes, I don't know where that number comes from)
I agree, along with the fact that after 1965, Wooden typically had the "pick of the litter" in terms of getting talent, much more so than does Geno. There were only a handful of brand names, Duke, North Carolina, Indiana, UCLA and Kentucky and that was about it.Different sports, different GOATs. What Wooden did will never be equaled, but he was playing in a completely different era (no jumping to the pros, fewer games to win the tournament, etc) and I don't think that Geno's records will ever be equaled either. There's room for both.
Wouldn't really call it a string, since the most SFs UConn has lost in a row has been 2 and a total of 6 stretching back to 1991. Tennessee has lost 5 SFs. So Pat was 8-5-5 in NC Wins-NC Losses-SF Losses while Geno is 8-0-6. Pat had a 44% success rate for an NC win when getting to the FF, while Geno is at 57%. Louisiana Tech is the only team to knock off the Vols twice in SF games, so once Pat got the FF her nemeses were UConn and LaTech.We know Geno won all the NCAA finals he has been in. But he does have a string of loss in semi-finals. Does he also hold the record in most semi-final loss while PS has the most final loss?
We know Geno won all the NCAA finals he has been in. But he does have a string of loss in semi-finals. Does he also hold the record in most semi-final loss while PS has the most final loss?
Being a Pat's fan as in NFL and looking at 5 SBs and 3 championships and recognizing how solid that is, I look at one additional area for Pat's record that some people are discounting ... Pat led TN to 18 FF and 13 championship games so basically she got to the FF 50% of her years coaching and to the championship game 33% of her years and won it 20% of her years. That is darn impressive! Geno may be perfect in his championship games but he has only gotten to 8 of them - and to 14 FF. At the current rate he will reach 18 FF in 4 more years! and 13 championship games in 5 (channeling Tony here!) Geno percentage is already comparable to Pat's but the raw numbers like with wins he still trails. (And with wins he is closing in on the highest win percentage, owned by Barmore at the moment.
Of note - if we go undated this year, Geno will have closed the winning percentage gap to .033% (86.845 to 86.878)
I know - but that is the situation - and I do expect Geno to get to the same raw numbers if he keeps coaching for 5 or 6 more years.
You may be the only person on the face of the earth who has used the phrase "only gotten to 8 of them" when referring to National Championship games.
I agree, along with the fact that after 1965, Wooden typically had the "pick of the litter" in terms of getting talent, much more so than does Geno. There were only a handful of brand names, Duke, North Carolina, Indiana, UCLA and Kentucky and that was about it.
Oh no, if UConn goes "undated?" Is this another one of those Chicken Little comments about no one wanting to play UConn in the future?Of note - if we go undated this year, Geno will have closed the winning percentage gap to .033% (86.845 to 86.878)
Yep that's one of four critical streaks, along with 25 wins or more every season, Sweet 16 or better tournament result, and top 10 ranking in the final poll. All of these, along with no consecutive losses, are streaks that have run since the conclusion of the 1992-93 season!MilfordHusky said:What's the second longest streak for games without consecutive losses? We hope to hit 21 YEARS this March. That's the most remarkable stat, in my view.
Oh, come now. You just have to be more open to the charms of your dance partners and also realize that most of those pretty things sashaying at the other joints just look that way because they have a lot of make-up slathered on them that will eventually fall off when the bubbles burst and the reign of red ink starts spattering down.Dobbs - sure feels 'undated' in the musical chairs of conference realignment!
What's the second longest streak for games without consecutive losses? We hope to hit 21 YEARS this March. That's the most remarkable stat, in my view.