IMO Hartley is a player that shows up for every game. She's my pick as the go to player.
every game... even with all the "turnovers"IMO Hartley is a player that shows up for every game. She's my pick as the go to player.
Why do you like to relive all the old comments that you see as overly critical? There's a Bria love-fest going on right now (rightly so) but you need to drag this up again?every game... even with all the "turnovers"
everyone does it... you probably just notice mine a little bit more, thats all!Why do you like to relive all the old comments that you see as overly critical? There's a Bria love-fest going on right now (rightly so) but you need to drag this up again?
IMO Hartley is a player that shows up for every game. She's my pick as the go to player.
Like I said in the beginning. She's our best player.
IMO, she's already better than a senior Renee. She still turns the ball over a bit much, but she's being asked to do a lot and she's just a sophomore.
Alex is right. But I think it is fair to say that Bria is at least as good as Renee was as a sophomore. Bria is not even 50 games into a 150+ (hopefully) career. She is already very good and certainly clutch.Renee as a senior was:
a) a three years running team captain and the leader on a team that featured two of thre greatest players in WCBB history.
b) first-team AA
c) had a 2:1 A:TO ratio while averaging 16.5 PPG...again, playing alongside two of the greatest players in CBB history. Bria is 14.9 PPG with a 1.34/1 A:TO ratio.
Bria absolutely could be better than Renee when all is said and done. She's not there yet.
That's definitely an admissable argument (though Renee's 13.3 PPG for the 2006-07 season and 1.72 A:TO ratio were nothing to sneeze at). Renee was a combo guard that became progessively more dominant as a PG over time. Bria is a terrific scorer and against most teams a very solid PG (better than last season, and yes, even with CD back in the lineup she's still running point a lot of the time), but she did not respond well when Baylor kicked the defensive pressure up a notch. Renee would have as a senior- probably not as a soph.Alex is right. But I think it is fair to say that Bria is at least as good as Renee was as a sophomore. Bria is not even 50 games into a 150+ (hopefully) career. She is already very good and certainly clutch.
I think Renee's shot selection and shooting percentage increased and were good by her senior year. How do her percentages compare with Bria's?That's definitely an admissable argument (though Renee's 13.3 PPG for the 2006-07 season and 1.72 A:TO ratio were nothing to sneeze at). Renee was a combo guard that became progessively more dominant as a PG over time. Bria is a terrific scorer and against most teams a very solid PG (better than last season, and yes, even with CD back in the lineup she's still running point a lot of the time), but she did not respond well when Baylor kicked the defensive pressure up a notch. Renee would have as a senior- probably not as a soph.
Sophomore seasons:I think Renee's shot selection and shooting percentage increased and were good by her senior year. How do her percentages compare with Bria's?
Renee as a senior was:
a) a three years running team captain and the leader on a team that featured two of thre greatest players in WCBB history.
b) first-team AA
c) had a 2:1 A:TO ratio while averaging 16.5 PPG...again, playing alongside two of the greatest players in CBB history. Bria is 14.9 PPG with a 1.34/1 A:TO ratio.
Bria absolutely could be better than Renee when all is said and done. She's not there yet.