RockyMTblue2
Don't Look Up!
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 22,471
- Reaction Score
- 99,550
Is it fair? It's a question I've been asking myself for quite a while.
Agreed, this game is a must play well for Ice and Jana, especially Ice. If they cannot hang with Crooks and increase the rebounds and 2nd chance points, I see Geno going small for the rest of the year.I expect Ice and Jana to get big minutes tonight, banging in the low blocks against Audi Crooks. There is no way Geno will play Sarah or Morgan at the 5 so long as Crooks is in the game. In fact, I suspect that Geno was sending a message to both Ice and Jana last game with upcoming games against Iowa St (Crooks) and USC (Iriafen).
??Agreed, this game is a must play well for Ice and Jana, especially Ice. If they cannot hang with Crooks and increase the rebounds and 2nd chance points, I see Geno going small for the rest of the year.
Trust your eyes, you’ve seen the games. We get nothing from that position. Jana is a freshman who’s never played until now so she is still getting her feet wet and she’s aggressive by nature, so I would start her. Ice comes off the bench if at all if I were the coach.This dude is a pessimist. Last year, before the USC game, his entire video was all about how UCONN's run is over, we're gonna lose to Juju because she scores 30 PTS a night, etc. Pretty sure he was praising Brady weeks back. Don't trust him.
The Iowa State game represents the best test for the bigs so far this season. And then Geno will have an 11 game sample to go by which is approx a third of the season. This and the USC game are the last real competitive games for a while. Then 11 games against BE competition, another third of the season, might not provide enough of a game environment to further test the bigs. I hope I am wrong, but I see Jana as next year and Ice staying at her current level of play.??
I don’t ever remember Geno making a personnel decision that will affect the entire season based on one game. He knows the regular season is for building chemistry, finding the right player lineups, and learning how to play other defenses in preparation for the postseason. He also know putting pressure to “perform or else I’ll bench you “ is not a good way to build confidence
that might be an issue, but if the No. 1 goal is winning what this team most needs is to put the ball through the hoop consistently when they get clean open perimeter shots --- and they get plenty of them. poor shooting is the first priority issue. it's that simple.Agreed, this game is a must play well for Ice and Jana, especially Ice. If they cannot hang with Crooks and increase the rebounds and 2nd chance points, I see Geno going small for the rest of the year.
Ice has developed a nice outside jumper since last season. She will be dangerous if left open.that might be an issue, but if the No. 1 goal is winning what this team most needs is to put the ball through the hoop consistently when they get clean open perimeter shots --- and they get plenty of them. poor shooting is the first priority issue. it's that simple.
I agree with you, Nan. Excellent point.??
I don’t ever remember Geno making a personnel decision that will affect the entire season based on one game. He knows the regular season is for building chemistry, finding the right player lineups, and learning how to play other defenses in preparation for the postseason. He also know putting pressure to “perform or else I’ll bench you “ is not a good way to build confidence
Agree, well said, players lights come on at different times. It has been written time after time that Bigs generally take longer to mature their game. It appears that this is true. We are seeing Ice get better at certain things faster than others. She is making some very good passes; shots are starting to drop. Her natural position with her height and size is a 4, give her time to become a better than average 5.The problem here is that Ice is not Sarah! People look at Sarah, then wonder why Ice can’t be like that! Well, that is unreasonable and unfair, imo! She will continue to get better and will eventually be a solid contributor for us. Probably not a superstar, but solid! She just needs more time, not minutes but longterm. This is a tempest in a teakettle and Geno is simply trying to light a fire under Ice! Of course, he is also rewarding Morgan. This guy tried to compare Ice and DeBerry! That does not fly at all! At least Ice makes an effort! Ice will be fine! Just don’t expect Sarah just becausej she’s big!
He's "seeing" that if he posts provocative content it will lead to lots of clicks from UConn's large fan base, the OP being a prime example. For his purposes, it does not matter whether what he is saying is true or warranted. All that matters is that people click on his site and the YouTube algorithm takes note.Ugh.....this video just feels wrong. It's too soon to write Ice off at all. This is her redshirt sophomore season and she's a starter. What the heck is this guy seeing to think this?
UCONN get 12.1ppg, 9.3 rpg and 2.9 assists combined from Ice and Jana, so not exactly nothing. At this point in the season I'll take that. When Aubrey returns the team will have more flexibility, with hopefully no drop off in production. The larger issue as I see it is the duo's defensive abilities. Together they only average 1 bpg. Against teams with aggressive guards like ND, that number needs to improve. Again Aubrey will help that situation a lot.Trust your eyes, you’ve seen the games. We get nothing from that position. Jana is a freshman who’s never played until now so she is still getting her feet wet and she’s aggressive by nature, so I would start her. Ice comes off the bench if at all if I were the coach.
I'm pretty sure that "preform or else..." speech of Sylvia Hatchell [at half-time] ended her career at UNC.??
I don’t ever remember Geno making a personnel decision that will affect the entire season based on one game. He knows the regular season is for building chemistry, finding the right player lineups, and learning how to play other defenses in preparation for the postseason. He also know putting pressure to “perform or else I’ll bench you “ is not a good way to build confidence
He's "seeing" that if he posts provocative content it will lead to lots of clicks from UConn's large fan base, the OP being a prime example. For his purposes, it does not matter whether what he is saying is true or warranted. All that matters is that people click on his site and the YouTube algorithm takes note.
I believe that they have 3 more NC than the combined list of active coachesI think many here would agree that Geno, CD & Company are better at preparing their team for the important 6 game tourney at the end of the season than UT's Pat Summit, so let's go back in time to 1996-1997 where that version of the Lady Vols lost twice in a row TWO times during the regular season, and lost in the Semi-finals of the SEC tourney to an unranked Auburn by 2 (UT having entered the tourney in 5th place in the SEC, with the other four teams ahead of them ranked #6-9, with UT ranked tenth), after needing OT to beat #9 LSU in the quarter finals, which means they had excellent competition in their conference, and they lost two of their conference games to unranked teams.
Although, UT beat Geno's #1 seeded Huskies in the Elite Eight (1997), the point that I am trying to make is that Geno, CD & Company still have 24 games to get the experience, line-ups, chemistry, etc. right before making the all important 6 game run to the NC #12. High performing self-starters only need a little positive encouragement to keep "climbing that mountain" that many think is NOT possible, so I, for one, desire to keep my comments positive.
Yes, there are many more competitive teams now than in 1996-1997 women's college basketball. However, currently there are no more experienced coaches than Geno & CD at preparing one's team, and I believe that their 11 NCs are equal to all the other active coaches combined (I may have lost count in the record books).
This is not the time to "lock in" a singular line-up, but rather a range of line-ups that work against the likely teams that will need to be faced in the final six match-ups to the NC #12, without over-looking the numerous upsets possible in the early rounds of the NCAA tourney. It may be that the most important pieces to find is a starting line-up that can "get out of the gate" quickest to a 10 point lead (hopefully by 5 minutes into the game), and then a line-up that can maintain the lead and push it to >20 points before half-time, as well as creating the mindset that "we are down by four" while significantly ahead to focus on "winning the play in front of them" (whether on defense or offense).
Sometimes it takes a team through the conference tourney to figure all of that out. Remember, Pat Summit's team was the defending National Champions with a 23-10 record when they made that 6 game run in 1996-97.
Go Huskies!!!