I don't watch the football a lot. Is Diaco this bad? | Page 3 | The Boneyard

I don't watch the football a lot. Is Diaco this bad?

Status
Not open for further replies.
this response displays a fundamental lack of any football knowledge... so why arent dez bryant, larry fitzgerald, julio jones or odell beckham jr returning punts?

Because those teams have the option of finding quality kick returners from hundreds of college programs. Diaco has whatever leftovers he can find that weren't offered a scholarship from a p-5 school. So, if you have a receiver with a great pair of hands ,you use him to avoid just the sort of disaster which could have cost UConn the game. But Bob had even a bigger disaster planned.
 
Because those teams have the option of finding quality kick returners from hundreds of college programs. Diaco has whatever leftovers he can find that weren't offered a scholarship from a p-5 school. So, if you have a receiver with a great pair of hands ,you use him to avoid just the sort of disaster which could have cost UConn the game. But Bob had even a bigger disaster planned.
PS. If UConn had Odell, he would be returning kicks.
 
I find it comical that he keeps mentioning that we were on the 1/2 yard line, the 1/2 yard line. Shireffs made the handoff straight back to Johnson who was at around the 3and it was a slow play giving Navy a chance to regroup to stop the run. I believe he was tackled somewhere between the 1 and 2 yard line. He certainly did not get back to the 1/2 yard line. Play action would have been so much smarter.
 
Because those teams have the option of finding quality kick returners from hundreds of college programs. Diaco has whatever leftovers he can find that weren't offered a scholarship from a p-5 school. So, if you have a receiver with a great pair of hands ,you use him to avoid just the sort of disaster which could have cost UConn the game. But Bob had even a bigger disaster planned.


so instead of talking out of my I decided to look up some actual stats to see if your thinking is correct and surprise surprise you aren't. I took the top 10 receivers in college (usually a pretty good indication of good hands right?) and shocker only two of the ten are also the teams punt returner and the stunning stats of those WR studs? 8 RET for 76yds.... then I thought well hey ya know maybe the BEST punt returners aren't leading the country in receiving but surely are leading at least the team they play on right? wrong again.... of the top ten returners with at least 3 return attempts 2 are also leading the team in receiving, one of which is from powerhouse Georgia southern. also that little caveat you threw in about non P5 schools needing to utilize their best WR as PR? yea uh only two non P5 schools out of thirteen had their best WR pulling double duty.

Be more wrong.... you can't.
 
.-.
so instead of talking out of my I decided to look up some actual stats to see if your thinking is correct and surprise surprise you aren't. I took the top 10 receivers in college (usually a pretty good indication of good hands right?) and shocker only two of the ten are also the teams punt returner and the stunning stats of those WR studs? 8 RET for 76yds.... then I thought well hey ya know maybe the BEST punt returners aren't leading the country in receiving but surely are leading at least the team they play on right? wrong again.... of the top ten returners with at least 3 return attempts 2 are also leading the team in receiving, one of which is from powerhouse Georgia southern. also that little caveat you threw in about non P5 schools needing to utilize their best WR as PR? yea uh only two non P5 schools out of thirteen had their best WR pulling double duty.

Be more wrong.... you can't.

First of all, you have a really small data base to draw your conclusions.
Secondly, your examination is a bit simplistic.
First of all, the top ten receivers usually come from passing programs where the coaches are constantly recruiting fast guys with great hands and QB's who can really throw the ball. Not everyone can start so some catch the punts. A bevy of great handed receivers is not usually UConn's major asset and Shireffs is the best QB UConn has had in years.
The BEST punt returners are not always the BEST punt catchers. How many punt returns did Mercury Morris have for Miami's undefeated team? Shula had his sure handed safeties fielding about every punt.
Best punt returners tend to be a little short and are hard to pick up going over the middle. Coaches prefer taller receivers. So, punt returners usually are not big time receivers unless they are coming out of the backfield a la Reggie Bush.
Most good coaches play someone is up to the job and won't let the ball bounce 40 yards down the field.
However there are a few notable exceptions to you theory. I suppose names like Tim Brown, Rocket Ismael and John Rodgers are foreign to you.
A few more 66 yard punts and you will see Thomas back there.
 
Please don't ever make the Calhoun comparison to Diaco again. This is Diaco's third season. In Calhoun's second season we won the NIT. In his fourth season we won the Big East, made it to the Elite Eight and he won National Coach of the Year.

Diaco won't be fired for this, but it doesn't mean it's not a terribly dispiriting loss on a number of levels. I'm a casual CFB fan who was supportive of his hire because he seemed to have good energy and a good pedigree, if a bit wacky. I am now convinced that he is an over-matched dunce who does not have the capacity to bring the football program to the next level. He's had a lot of chances to show that he's crazy like a fox. Unfortunately for us, I think he's just dumb.
I hope you realize rebuilding a basketball team and rebuilding a football from the dead are two completely different things.

Diaco took a team completely devoid of talent to a bowl and beat a Houston team who whopped FSU in a BCS bowl game.

Obviously you cannot compare Calhoun and Diaco, but trying to compare rebuilding a basketball and a football team is ridiculous.
 
I hope you realize rebuilding a basketball team and rebuilding a football from the dead are two completely different things.
Uh, yeah:
I agree fully that it takes longer to build a football program than a basketball program, but we've been trying to build a football program for a lot longer than Diaco's term; and even just limiting it to him, there seem to be an unusually high number of WTF critical decision-making blunders during his tenure, and I'm less and less sanguine about his ability to develop in a way that reduces them the more I see him try to explain them.

In short, he is losing credibility with me based on the admittedly intermittent observations I've made of him, and I don't think it's an unfounded reaction.
 
Uh, yeah:
Well this is a discussion about Diaco, not the history of building UConn football (which actually was in a great place thanks to Edsall but the administration put the guillotine to the program by hiring PP).

Diaco has undeniably made some major blunders, but he has also done some very good things with what he was given, which was basically nothing. Bowl game in year 2, lets see how year 3 goes, if he wins 7 games and goes to a bowl no one can say the program is not headed in the right direction despite some clock management gaffes along the way.
 
.-.
Well this is a discussion about Diaco, not the history of building UConn football (which actually was in a great place thanks to Edsall but the administration put the guillotine to the program by hiring PP).

Diaco has undeniably made some major blunders, but he has also done some very good things with what he was given, which was basically nothing. Bowl game in year 2, lets see how year 3 goes, if he wins 7 games and goes to a bowl no one can say the program is not headed in the right direction despite some clock management gaffes along the way.
Believe me, I want to like him and I want to believe we are headed in the right direction. I have posted as much here from the time he was hired. I'm only saying that it is getting tougher and tougher for me to do so the more I see of him. The platitudes and cliches in which he speaks aren't helping.
 
He reminds me more and more of Jerry Faust at Notre Dame with each passing day. Great interview. Knew all the right terms. Very exciting and excited about his team and his job. And completely utterly and entirely over his head.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,328
Messages
4,564,208
Members
10,464
Latest member
Rollskies27


Top Bottom