I didn't see a discussion of this brilliant article on recruiting | Page 4 | The Boneyard

I didn't see a discussion of this brilliant article on recruiting

Status
Not open for further replies.
If we get twenty 2 star athletes with offers from schools like Cuse, Pitt, Temple, Cinci, Louisville, Maryland, USF, UCF, SMU, Houston, ECU, BCU, etc. @whaler11 myself, and others will be happy.

If we get twenty 2 star athletes with offers from Maine, UMass, Stony Brook, Army, Bryant, Fordham, etc, @whaler11 myself, and others will be very concerned. It's really simple. There's a reason that those teams aren't consistently competitive against the teams we have to play, and it's the level of athlete they are able to recruit, not how those athletes are ranked.

Florida State's recruiting ranking has absolutely nothing to do with us. It's like discussing whether or not the handling of a Mercedes E class is overrated, while making a decision between buying a Nissan Altima or Chevrolet Malibu.

I don't know why this is so hard for some moderators (without naming names) and others to understand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
167,701
Messages
4,535,671
Members
10,412
Latest member
RussellSage
Top Bottom