Hurley Suspension? | Page 6 | The Boneyard

Hurley Suspension?

What could he have “coached better” that the team didn’t already know they needed to do.

I’ll hang up and listen

Who did Marquette have a tough time stopping? Maybe run some stuff to get Rees the ball a helluva lot more? Maybe give more space to James so he can’t penetrate and make everyone scramble on D, and find open people?

That’s part of coaching as well. It’s certainly not all on him but let’s not leave him out of this fiasco.
 
That is really bad (My excuse will sound like a good one: My left hemisphere doesn't want to talk to the right hemisphere and vice versa so these things can happen -- or at least that is my story and I can get a doctor's note if necessary).
It’s actually a very understandable mistake to make, because despite all the revisionist history on the Boneyard - just like Demary, Newton spent more time during Big East games being body slammed to the floor on drives to the hoop than he spent at the free throw line.
 
We attempted 3s right at our season average, which is 159th in D1. We aren’t over-reliant on 3s in the contemporary game, and Marquette didn’t dictate anything. If we don’t have an aberration of a bad shooting night, we win. This is high variance game played by college kids. Just about every top team has had a bad loss or two this year. We don’t have 4 NBA players on this roster. A couple WTF losses and several non-dominant wins were going to happen. I don’t know why some of you seem to think ‘24 is supposed to magically every year because we have Dan Hurley and because we are UConn
 
I am fine with the no call on Silas.

That’s not why Hurley got teched up. He got the T for the effort his team has given down the stretch here. Think about all the comments recently on their effort and the urgency needed to get to that next level.

Handwringing on whether it was or wasn’t a foul is a waste of bandwidth.
 
We are 27–4 and nationally ranked. Four losses all season that’s elite. Yes, the latest loss was to Marquette a game we should’ve had but one slip doesn’t erase an entire season of high-level basketball.
We’re still a favorite in the BE Tournament and a legitimate Final Four contender in the NCAAs. If you’re saying this team is “no good,” you’re missing the big picture.
Support the team. March is what counts.

Being in the game chat has become an eye opener and not in a good way. Constant negativity, nonstop player and coach bashing, and meltdown posts every possession isn’t support, it’s noise. Frustration is normal, but turning it into attacks just drags everyone down and does nothing for the team.
If the chat is just doom and blame, what’s the point?
 
I am fine with the no call on Silas.

That’s not why Hurley got teched up. He got the T for the effort his team has given down the stretch here. Think about all the comments recently on their effort and the urgency needed to get to that next level.

Handwringing on whether it was or wasn’t a foul is a waste of bandwidth.
I don't know about that. Yes, no doubt he is frustrated with the current effort but Silas no call was the tip of the iceberg.
 
.-.
Nothing to do with our coach making a complete fool of himself
Not making excuses for Hurley. I’m just pointing out the officiating has been biased all season, and once you see the pattern you can’t unsee it. Hurley and his squad lost because they plain sucked not because of the refs.
 
Not making excuses for Hurley. I’m just pointing out the officiating has been biased all season, and once you see the pattern you can’t unsee it. Hurley and his squad lost because they plain sucked not because of the refs.
Yes, and Hurley did not cost us the game. I can't wait to go on to the Tounament. This BE has been a long season it seems.
 
it’s honestly kinda pathetic. I look like a dunce constantly defending his antics to my friends of other fanbases.
Not everyone sees that moment as an embarrassment. Hurley was standing up for his players and refusing to let a crucial no call slide. That wasn’t losing control that was a coach fighting for his team when the stakes were high. His guys see that passion. They know he’s in the trenches with them, willing to take the heat to make a point. That kind of fire builds trust and unity, especially heading into the games that matter most.
 
I don't know about that. Yes, no doubt he is frustrated with the current effort but Silas no call was the tip of the iceberg.
[/QUOTE]


It’s not a foul ever. Gold went straight up and his hand came down after the play, not even sure if it had any contact anyway, but you’re never getting a call there. Good drive and take by Silas but just didn’t go in. Nothing you can do, Dan severely overreacted.
 
Who did Marquette have a tough time stopping? Maybe run some stuff to get Rees the ball a helluva lot more? Maybe give more space to James so he can’t penetrate and make everyone scramble on D, and find open people?

That’s part of coaching as well. It’s certainly not all on him but let’s not leave him out of this fiasco.
I already said it in another post but I’ll say it again:

This was the 31st game of the season. The players are well-paid professionals who should have knowledge of our offensive sets by now and all theoretically have a decent BBIQ.

I would be absolutely stunned if Danny, Kimani, and Luke did not mention strongly at any point during timeouts, or yelling when game action was on, to “get the ball into the post”.

If anyone was at the game behind the bench and confirm that the above happened, I’ll give you $1000.

This isn’t 5th grade church league rec ball where they should have to pause the game to have to coaches come out on the court and explain to the players how to pass the ball into the post in the spirit of teaching the game.

If you want to discuss/debate the merits of how pulling all the starters and putting in the scrubs for 3-4 minutes would have gone, I’m fine with that. It may have “taught them a lesson” and been “great coaching”, but the outcome likely would have been the same.
 
.-.
I don't know about that. Yes, no doubt he is frustrated with the current effort but Silas no call was the tip of the iceberg.


It’s not a foul ever. Gold went straight up and his hand came down after the play, not even sure if it had any contact anyway, but you’re never getting a call there. Good drive and take by Silas but just didn’t go in. Nothing you can do, Dan severely overreacted.
[/QUOTE]

I think he knew enough that this was a “good” time to seriously overreact. The game was over. Getting a T was not going to impact the outcome.
 
It’s actually somewhat interesting as for the last ~24h, all of social media is back on the “Bad Hurley” train. The fact that Bobby also got riled up the same day is delicious.

In the same way that Pitino took all the blame for StJ getting blown out by us, this shifts a chunk of the media narrative away from the team. As stated nicely in a post above, is also a reminder that he’s all-in for this team…maybe it lights a fire.

That’s my blue-tinted glasses take after a decent night’s sleep.
 
What could he have “coached better” that the team didn’t already know they needed to do.

I’ll hang up and listen
stubbornly staying in 5 out perimeter offense vs 1-2-2 matchup man, which wa designed to stop a perimeter offense. Needed to not go away from posting up on block, and never got the ball to the foul line, which would distort the defense. x and o lack of adjustment. if the 3 pt game is struggling, go to what works.

watch how game plan/scout fixes this when we see them next week
 
Last edited:
I will take falling to 27-4 and a 2 seed any day over what we all endured before Hurley took over. Heck, we had several NIT years under Calhoun (granted, pre NIL) and now we freak out if we drop out of the top 10.

That being said, why does our offense not run the same complex sets it did two years ago? My brother brought up a good point that yesterday it seemed more like Ollie offense than Hurley offense. Pass around the perimeter and hoist a three.

Is it a personnel issue?
 
I will take falling to 27-4 and a 2 seed any day over what we all endured before Hurley took over. Heck, we had several NIT years under Calhoun (granted, pre NIL) and now we freak out if we drop out of the top 10.

That being said, why does our offense not run the same complex sets it did two years ago? My brother brought up a good point that yesterday it seemed more like Ollie offense than Hurley offense. Pass around the perimeter and hoist a three.

Is it a personnel issue?
Lack of ball handlers is my guess
 
.-.
Good Lord CBS Sports is obsessed. I’ve already seen like 5 different videos on Facebook about the ejection. Seemed like a no call to me so I think a lot of his reaction was frustration over the team playing like dogsht.
That wasn’t a foul on Demary’s last miss. Even if it happened earlier in the game. And in this particular game, there were plenty of questionable calls that went in our favor as well.

They played harder than us. With a regular season championship on the line, that should never have happened. But it’s not the coaches who showed up without any intensity — it’s the players,
 
According to AI

No foul was called on
Silas Demary Jr.
's game-tying layup attempt at the end of the UConn vs. Marquette game on Saturday, March 7, 2026. While there was visible contact between Demary and Marquette's Ben Gold, officials determined Gold maintained verticality and ruled it a clean defensive play

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm going to point out that these officials call fouls when there is no contact, absolutely none, so to suggest they will never call a foul when there obviously is significant contact is just not accurate. I still don't know, since they never showed a replay and they never showed us different angles like they do all game long.

And even verticality doesn't apply if Gold didn't establish position, that's still a blocking foul. I guess it's either a charge or a block, it just can't be a no call with visible contact

Anyhow, doesn't matter to me, we're a two seed in the BET and probably a two seed in the dance. Two seeds play at night, so I'm cool. I also hope this lights a fire under them that stays lit

I'm on to MSG. Let's go Huskies, I believe
 
stubbornly staying in 5 out perimeter offense vs 1-2-2 matchup man, designed to stop a perimeter offense. Needed to not go away from posting up on block, and never got to the foul line, which would distort the defense. x and o lack of adjustment. if the 3 pt game is struggling, go to what works.

FreeKlaiber this reply is not shade at you, it’s just that your post was the last of many to claim that we didn’t do anything to get an inside game going.

Tortured myself and rewatched the last 15min of the 2nd half.

The tl;dr is that we ran great offense that gave Reed and Reibe many opportunities. As well a ton of great looks for our shooters.

We just didn’t execute. It wasn’t coaching malpractice.

Read the possession-by-possession summaries below if you want:

15:30- Reed PnR, Solo feeds him in the lane, he passes to a wide open Mullin’s who misses the 3. Reed picks up his 3rd foul on the rebound. Reibe comes in

15:00- First play in, Reibe sets high pick, rolls, gets the pass, makes a floater

14:30- no play develops, Alex gets called for foul on the high screen

13:53- Reibe sets low screen for Ball who curls and bricks a wide open 3.

13:00- Reed back in, sets high screen, rolls, Ross tries to pass in, not the best pass, Parham tips it for a TO

12:24- play develops, Reed is on the right block with good position. Alex dribbles from the corner, gets stuck in midair and makes a bad pass to the top of the lane. A pass to Tarris was possible but ignored

11:58 - Reed hands off to Silas and rolls to the hoop. Open. Silas makes a poor no-look pass attempt to Solo on the wing. It gets deflected for a TO.

11:32- Tarris sets up on the blocks, gets double teamed, lane is open, Silas nice drive to the cup left side, gets Gold to commit his 4th foul. A fine play

11:00- Silas gets by his man, drives to the lane, fumbles the ball in the lane and TO

10:16- Tarris sets 2 high screens, gets ready to set a 3rd for Alex, Solo beats his man, drives the lane, misses makeable layup

9:23- Wasted possession. Mullins gets ball poked out w 17 on shot clock. We inbound, waste 12 seconds dribbling on the perimeter, Ball has to jack a desperation 3.

8:43- Tarris sets a high screen for Alex. He is sealed off for a wide open look. We’ve seen him make a top of the key 3 many times in his career. It goes halfway down and comes out. No issue with this possession & shot selection

8:17- Reed seals his man in the middle of the lane. An entry pass could have been made by Silas, but Marquette runs a 2nd man at him and pokes the ball away. Nice D, tough look for Silas there. Needs to be better. We get bailed out by a foul call.

8:06- On the ensuing possession, Reed sets a screen on the blocks, turns, and is WIDE OPEN. Silas completely misses him. Bad coaching? Silas passes to Mullins who misses the long 3.

7:30. - PnR, Reed gets it, he drives, misses the layup, Ross dunks the rebound

6:30- the vaunted DOUBLE BIGS. Early foul, Reibe subs out. Solo drives into the lane on the inbounds, takes a decent shot, not great, but makeable and clean look. Misses

5:43- Set develops, Reed PnR, he drifts down to the blocks, Karaban comes off the screen, clanks a wide open 3.

5:15- Reed is in the paint area the whole time. Ross dribbles from the left corner towards the left elbow. It is CLEAR he is looking for Reed to get established for an entry pass. Unfortunately, Reed was really soft about trying to seal his man to make it even possible to give him an entry pass. I’m going to put this one on Reed not taking change and DEMANDING the ball enough here. If he seals his man, Ross can at least try to make an entry pass. Ball gets tipped out of Ross’s hands, we recover it, Demary pushes it back into our end. Interestingly, Reed is wide open on the right block. If we were capable of throwing a decent Alley-Oop, this could have been an easy one. Silas passes to Mullins in the corner who buries the 3. We’ll take it. But 2 opportunities for Reed to contribute. On the players for not making it happen.

4:28- Ross throws an entry pass into Reed on the left block. Over the back reach-in on Marquette.

4:21- Standard inbounds play to get a top of the key 3 that we’ve seen a million times. Mullins is wide open and misses. No issue with the play or shot, especially after he had just made 3 on the play before

3:55- Marquette goes zone, Reed flashes to foul line, wide open, gets ignored by Silas. Coaching malpractice? Eventually Silas gets fouled and shoots FTs

3:27- Reed picks up 4th foul

3:10- Reed down on the right block, Silas starts to penetrate lane, could have been a dish, but he gets fouled before the play develops

2:05- Reed has good position on the right block. Solo get bal in corner, upfakes, goes by his man, but is fouled. Likely would have dished to Reed if not fouled

1:22- Reed sets high screen, Silas passes to Alex in the corner. Reed should roll to the hoop but starts it late, Gold defends it well. Alex airballs the 3, Ross on weak side puts the rebound in

0:54- Stack set at FT line. Silas drives to lane and actually could have shot a layup. He defers, kicks to Ross in corner, who passes to a wide open Karaban who bricks a 3 we’ve seen him make many times before. Reed is under the hoop, gets fouled. Makes both FTs. Good on him.

We ran a bunch of plays that had Reed as a viable option. The “ignored him” narrative is not true.
 
We are currently blinded as a program for having recently had one of the best NCAA teams of all time a couple years ago. I honestly believe if we never had 2024 we would have a completely different expectation of this team and its players. We cant always have an all time team. Enjoy the struggle. Its what makes winning it all so much more enjoyable. We are becoming a KY fan base expecting to win every year and being absolutely miserable the entire time.
 
Not everyone sees that moment as an embarrassment. Hurley was standing up for his players and refusing to let a crucial no call slide. That wasn’t losing control that was a coach fighting for his team when the stakes were high. His guys see that passion. They know he’s in the trenches with them, willing to take the heat to make a point. That kind of fire builds trust and unity, especially heading into the games that matter most.
I'm not sure this thread is the place for this comment, but I've been trying to think about how Hurley's "working the refs" is different than Calhoun's "working the refs." When Jim Calhoun went after the refs, it seemed more a criticism of the call unless a personal criticism. You might hear that "freaking bullshit", but to my knowledge, he never called anyone a "freaking clown".

Calhoun had gravitas. Yeah, he's a big man and he looked furious sometimes, but he seemed angry and not out of control. Hurley reminds me of Mick Cronin. His complaints seem more whiny than forceful, but, what I think causes so much personal animosity between the refs and him is that he attacks them personally, rather than the call. He's also less judicious. I think you need to pick your spots.
 
I will take falling to 27-4 and a 2 seed any day over what we all endured before Hurley took over. Heck, we had several NIT years under Calhoun (granted, pre NIL) and now we freak out if we drop out of the top 10.

That being said, why does our offense not run the same complex sets it did two years ago? My brother brought up a good point that yesterday it seemed more like Ollie offense than Hurley offense. Pass around the perimeter and hoist a three.

Is it a personnel issue?
If you pay close attention, the same intricate sets, screens, ghost screens, etc, etc are still there. And generate a ton of clean looks still.
 
.-.
We are currently blinded as a program for having recently had one of the best NCAA teams of all time a couple years ago. I honestly believe if we never had 2024 we would have a completely different expectation of this team and its players. We cant always have an all time team. Enjoy the struggle. It’s what makes winning it all so much more enjoyable. We are becoming a KY fan base expecting to win every year and being absolutely miserable the entire time.
Somewhat agree but I don’t think we compare the teams in the way you’re describing.

This team doesn’t have the alpha-take over the game type guy. 2024 had several. We should definitely expect to have a minimum of one with the talent on this team.

This team has no ball handlers except Silas. 2024 had several. We should definitely expect to have at least 2 guys who can penetrate. Malachi is unplayable and that’s killed us.

Those are the only things I compare this team to 2024 with. And I think it’s fair to expect better. Doesn’t mean I expect to win it all by 10+ points each game.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
167,539
Messages
4,527,266
Members
10,401
Latest member
TBone9989


Top Bottom