Hurley and Transfer Portal | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Hurley and Transfer Portal

Joined
Nov 25, 2019
Messages
2,083
Reaction Score
6,553
He may have to worry about the portal outbound this winter
Right. Three years ago he wouldn't play IW and the next year found him to be his best big man.
Last year he overlooked AS so much there was a fear he'd lose him to the portal until a late season change of heart gave him more time and significant development.
This year it's SJ and RD and, to a degree, too little usage of JH.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,297
Reaction Score
33,459
I do not think that there was a meaningful upgrade available in the transfer portal that would come to UConn. It isn't like UConn football where Mora can cover his eyes and point at a random name and that player will be able to start. Hurley's team is decent when everyone is healthy. There are not that many players that would be an upgrade, and those that were available didn't want to come here for whatever reason, because it appears that Hurley did try.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,299
Reaction Score
15,768
I think it's time we properly criticize Hurley for something he can control.

This wasn't a flawless team going into the season. We had two extra scholarships that coulda been filled with veteran talent to push our current top 8. We knew this team lacked shooting, reliable offensive creators, and still we gave DH the benefit of doubt. He needs to take advantage of every opportunity to improve the team moving forward.

I'll never blame coaches for players not executing, that's the players half of the deal. But I will blame the coach if he doesn't bring in players capable of executing, that's their half of the deal.
I never gave him the benefit of anything on this. If a Coaches job isn't to evaluate weaknesses and address personnel issues during the off season I don't know what it is. Great recruiting class means zippo if we can't shoot and want to compete in March.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,299
Reaction Score
15,768
I do not think that there was a meaningful upgrade available in the transfer portal that would come to UConn. It isn't like UConn football where Mora can cover his eyes and point at a random name and that player will be able to start. Hurley's team is decent when everyone is healthy. There are not that many players that would be an upgrade, and those that were available didn't want to come here for whatever reason, because it appears that Hurley did try.
He gave every signal he wasn't enthusiastic about the portal process and was prioritizing Freshman recruits, which was successful. The results speak to that on both fronts.
 

UConnSportsGuy

Addicted to all things UCONN!
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,066
Reaction Score
5,888
Needed at least one more ball handler.

You're right. If only Hurley was able to have recruited a Top 70 overall recruit who was also a Top 10 PG in this past class...that is what this team really needs. Even if he took this young freshman and gave him 10 minutes a game to give RJ a break on the ball and take off the pressure and let this freshman build up experience. I wish Hurley had recruited someone like that......oh wait a minute. :eek:
 
Joined
Jun 8, 2014
Messages
8,397
Reaction Score
27,919
Bad take - No matter what you think of them, if we had got the DPOY and 6th Man of Year from another top conference, Hurley would have struck gold.

Don't forget, Cole and Martin as transfers are pretty good gets also.
Let’s be clear though, Tyler Phommachanh as 6MOTY averaging 7.5 and 2 is not a 6MOTY in like, any other conference. I was and still am absolutely flabbergasted as to how he got that award last season.

I also love the kid and love his service to the team over the past 4+ years, but I would’ve been content on moving on from him for someone who was more than one dimensional.
 

MyDorona

The Hebrew Hammer
Joined
Nov 27, 2018
Messages
222
Reaction Score
1,434
There are a number of posters saying that Hurley didn’t try or didn’t look for a transfer. I don’t think that’s accurate. I think this is a result of people buying Hurley’s spin.

Early on, there were many rumors that Hurley & Co. were in on some top-15 transfers. Those transfers committed quickly to other schools. There was also some credible evidence that Freeman “stepped down” because Hurley wasn’t happy with his level of commitment recruiting transfers in the offseason.

It is probably true that Hurley & Co. had no interest in what was left after the top 15-20 transfers were off the board. It’s also true that Hurley’s pre-season media campaign included the refrain that he doesn’t want to make this Transfer U. However, don’t buy that they weren’t interested in transfer help- particularly when it comes to shooters and ball handlers.
 

cohenzone

Old Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
18,899
Reaction Score
22,029
I never gave him the benefit of anything on this. If a Coaches job isn't to evaluate weaknesses and address personnel issues during the off season I don't know what it is. Great recruiting class means zippo if we can't shoot and want to compete in March.
Um, Hawkins is supposed to address that issue and he is seeing the floor. Polley supposedly is a shooter and the fact that he isn’t making them is not something a coach can change. Martin is not a horrible shooter. Ditto Cole who right now isn’t shooting at a great clip. I’d guess Hurley thought he had that base reasonably covered with some contribution. from Akok who right now is making a case for Johnson to play more, and Whaley . While I’ve said Gaffney (who also supposedly can shoot) isn’t the worst back up option, I’ve also said I’d like to see Diggins more. Can he make jumpers? A limited sample implies maybe.

There is some sort of assumption that some unidentified transfer would be taking and not missing a bunch of the shots all of the guys I’ve identified are missing. And play the D Hurley wants which has pretty good even in the losses. Personally, I think if the main offensive rebounders would stop tipping wildly so much and grab the ball to go back up and maybe score or be fouled we might get 6-10 more points a game.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
57,838
Reaction Score
213,412
I’m confused. Who were we supposed to get, and could have gotten, that would have projected as better than Hawkins?
Lol there are a lot of moving pieces in that question.

The kid I would’ve liked to have gotten is Kadary Richmond. That helps with our ballhandling and takes some of the pressure off of Cole. Moving Cole to the 2 likely helps three point shooting. He would’ve been a tough sell because of all the work Seton hall had already put in originally recruiting him.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,404
Reaction Score
5,968
Lol there are a lot of moving pieces in that question.

The kid I would’ve liked to have gotten is Kadary Richmond. That helps with our ballhandling and takes some of the pressure off of Cole. Moving Cole to the 2 likely helps three point shooting. He would’ve been a tough sell because of all the work Seton hall had already put in originally recruiting him.
But that’s the point, isn’t it? We are bashing on Hurley because the few people in the portal that could of helped us didn’t want to come here? There is a good chance Richmond might have helped us. But he didn’t have a clear path to starting here, either. He couldn’t assume he would push AJ to the bench. And he might have simply wanted to come home to NJ.
 
Joined
May 2, 2015
Messages
766
Reaction Score
3,495
Right. Three years ago he wouldn't play IW and the next year found him to be his best big man.
Last year he overlooked AS so much there was a fear he'd lose him to the portal until a late season change of heart gave him more time and significant development.
This year it's SJ and RD and, to a degree, too little usage of JH.

Hurley better be careful. His commitment to older guys is going to cost him his future guys.

Adama made comments after St. John’s disaster last year and Hurley started playing him. Adama was not happy. I bet there are several young guys not happy on the bench right now.

Hurley can’t do the BS he did with Bouk and Adama. He will be loosing players.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
57,838
Reaction Score
213,412
But that’s the point, isn’t it? We are bashing on Hurley because the few people in the portal that could of helped us didn’t want to come here? There is a good chance Richmond might have helped us. But he didn’t have a clear path to starting here, either. He couldn’t assume he would push AJ to the bench. And he might have simply wanted to come home to NJ.
Well first, I’m not bashing Hurley (and neither are you), though I have some questions regarding his game management.

You asked who could we have gotten out of the portal who would’ve helped us. Off the top of my head Richmond is one.

Did he have a clear path to starting? Well, yeah, the same path everyone has the starting, be the best player. If I were pitching it, I would pitch it exactly the way I explained it. Look, we expect you to get a significant amount of minutes at point. Don’t worry about Cole being ahead of you, because if you are as good as I think you are, we will move him to the two and you’ll get the majority of the minutes at the one.

Seton Hall dramatically improved themselves via the portal, with the additions of Richmond and Yetna. And, to be honest, I’d like to think that it should be rare that we lose a player to Seton Hall. No disrespect to them, but we are a land grant university with far better facilities and brand recognition. Both of them would have helped us, though Yetna had a harder path to playing time.

The notion that we didn’t get them and thus we couldn’t have got them is circular reasoning. Clearly, Curley wasn’t too happy with the effort we made in the portal and it resulted in a change of staff.

That said, I am not one of those who are piling on early because of one loss. I do, however, think that, in year four, criticism of his game management, especially at the end of games, is fair.
 
Joined
May 7, 2015
Messages
761
Reaction Score
2,778
Hurley better be careful. His commitment to older guys is going to cost him his future guys.

Adama made comments after St. John’s disaster last year and Hurley started playing him. Adama was not happy. I bet there are several young guys not happy on the bench right now.

Hurley can’t do the BS he did with Bouk and Adama. He will be loosing players.
DH already hinted that some guys were grumbling about not playing. With the reality of the portal he’d better pay attention. You can’t just play certain players and not give others the same chance. Diggins needs to get some legit run, and so does Samson.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2015
Messages
8,471
Reaction Score
57,048
We’re 9-3 with room to improve. You all are hitting the panic button WAY too early. It’s funny how the same posters are saying l, “ Nova is fine” and “we’re in danger”. I was at the game yesterday. We SUCKED FOR 36 minutes. But what stuck out more is our lack of a post presence. Sanogo makes a big difference, even as a black hole. Hurley drew up a beautiful play at the end of the game, Hawkins bricked it. We’ll be fine, we’ll figure it out. The season is FAR from determined. Hurley hasn’t been nearly as bad as some of you are saying. We handle losses TERRIBLY as a fan base.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
9,123
Reaction Score
32,547
We’re 9-3 with room to improve. You all are hitting the panic button WAY too early. It’s funny how the same posters are saying l, “ Nova is fine” and “we’re in danger”. I was at the game yesterday. We SUCKED FOR 36 minutes. But what stuck out more is our lack of a post presence. Sanogo makes a big difference, even as a black hole. Hurley drew up a beautiful play at the end of the game, Hawkins bricked it. We’ll be fine, we’ll figure it out. The season is FAR from determined. Hurley hasn’t been nearly as bad as some of you are saying. We handle losses TERRIBLY as a fan base.
I don’t know. I think for many of us, we’ve been seeing the same problems for a few years and we don’t see a way to something better yet. We haven’t had a true PG, we can’t drive and we can’t shoot. Aside from that, we have some very talented guys on the bench getting no chance to develop and we will need them to be all grown up by next season. I really thought that next season would be when we’d see a return to UConn basketball with superior athletes and solid skills. Now I foresee a young team with little experience trying to find their way. Diggins, Johnson and Springs need to get some run.
 

polycom

I heard a beep, who just joined?
Joined
Nov 14, 2014
Messages
7,685
Reaction Score
14,506
We’re 9-3 with room to improve. You all are hitting the panic button WAY too early. It’s funny how the same posters are saying l, “ Nova is fine” and “we’re in danger”. I was at the game yesterday. We SUCKED FOR 36 minutes. But what stuck out more is our lack of a post presence. Sanogo makes a big difference, even as a black hole. Hurley drew up a beautiful play at the end of the game, Hawkins bricked it. We’ll be fine, we’ll figure it out. The season is FAR from determined. Hurley hasn’t been nearly as bad as some of you are saying. We handle losses TERRIBLY as a fan base.
I’ve been waiting to see your blue colored glasses, thank you for not disappointing. You make the class of ‘14 proud.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2015
Messages
8,471
Reaction Score
57,048
I
I don’t know. I think for many of us, we’ve been seeing the same problems for a few years and we don’t see a way to something better yet. We haven’t had a true PG, we can’t drive and we can’t shoot. Aside from that, we have some very talented guys on the bench getting no chance to develop and we will need them to be all grown up by next season. I really thought that next season would be when we’d see a return to UConn basketball with superior athletes and solid skills. Now I foresee a young team with little experience trying to find their way. Diggins, Johnson and Springs need to get some run.
I agree in terms of Diggins and Samson. But with Cole, Sanogo, Hawkins, and possibly Martin returning. Nothing about that team is “young and inexperienced”. I don’t think we should judge this season and or this team just yet. We’ve beat some good teams, and lost to some good teams. It’s honestly we’re I thought we’d be. We’ve been top 25 for 75% of the season. I get the concerns, but I think the severity of the results have been a little overstated
 
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
1,593
Reaction Score
13,951
I might be wrong, but the perception at the time seemed to be that we pursued Noah Locke. He has started every game at Louisville. He is also having his worst shooting season yet, by far, 33.1% overall, 31.3% from 3, 77.8 FT%, and 10.5 PPG. Did we legitimately pursue him? Did we have a realistic chance at him? Would he have been a difference maker? I don’t know the answers. I don’t know which other shooters we went after and had an actual chance to land.
 

Attachments

  • 8B94EF0D-0185-4EDA-B9E1-956585FF5E53.jpeg
    8B94EF0D-0185-4EDA-B9E1-956585FF5E53.jpeg
    422.1 KB · Views: 93

Online statistics

Members online
337
Guests online
1,833
Total visitors
2,170

Forum statistics

Threads
157,772
Messages
4,121,254
Members
10,012
Latest member
GirlBoo1020


Top Bottom