- Joined
- Feb 10, 2013
- Messages
- 6,191
- Reaction Score
- 57,653
10,000-point scorers in NBA history:
Kentucky: 13 (1 20k scorer)
Duke: 12 (0 20k scorers)
UNC: 16 (3 20k scorers)
Indiana: 7 (1 20k scorer)
Kansas: 9 (2 20k scorers)
UCLA: 14 (3 20k scorers)
UConn: 9 (1 20k scorer)
Louisville: 4 (0 20k scorers)
Villanova: 2 (0 20k scorers)
Georgetown: 6 (2 20k scorers)
Syracuse: 3 (1 20k scorer)
Michigan State: 7 (0 20k scorers)
LSU: 3 (2 20k scorers)
Texas: 2 (BOTH are 20k scorers)
Arizona: 7 (0 20k scorers)
Ohio State: 7 (1 20k scorer)
Marquette: 4 (1 20k scorer)
Houston: 4 (3 20k scorers... lmao)
Michigan: 7 (0 20k scorers)
Florida: 5 (0 20k scorers)
Points aren't everything, of course, but they tend to be a good measure of how long a guy stays in the league, and guys tend to stay in the league a long time because they're good. There are outliers, naturally (Victor Oladipo's probably a starter for Indiana; Draymond is unquestionably a starter for Michigan State, and neither guy will end up with 10k points), but for the most part the above list tells a pretty accurate tale.
Anyway, here's the breakdown:
1. UCLA would curb stomp all comers. They're the clear No. 1.
2. UNC, Kansas, Kentucky & Duke are the next tier.
3. We're in the next group. I honestly think we've got an argument to be at the top of it, but man we've got to start putting elite players into the league again.
EDIT: And one point I've made elsewhere... Calhoun recognized the pace & space era early and recruited towards it (wings who could shoot, bigs who could run). Basically everybody we put into the league from Cliff to Rudy would be 20% better -- including guys like Travis & Smitty -- in today's game. Zero other programs can say the same other than maybe Villanova.
EDIT2: Just realized I really underrated Michigan State's team of Magic, Jason Richardson, Steve Smith, ZBo & Dray with guys like Scott Skiles, Kevin Willis, Jared Jackson, Gary Harris & Mo Pete off the bench. They're in that second tier with Duke, UNC, KU & UK.
Kentucky: 13 (1 20k scorer)
Duke: 12 (0 20k scorers)
UNC: 16 (3 20k scorers)
Indiana: 7 (1 20k scorer)
Kansas: 9 (2 20k scorers)
UCLA: 14 (3 20k scorers)
UConn: 9 (1 20k scorer)
Louisville: 4 (0 20k scorers)
Villanova: 2 (0 20k scorers)
Georgetown: 6 (2 20k scorers)
Syracuse: 3 (1 20k scorer)
Michigan State: 7 (0 20k scorers)
LSU: 3 (2 20k scorers)
Texas: 2 (BOTH are 20k scorers)
Arizona: 7 (0 20k scorers)
Ohio State: 7 (1 20k scorer)
Marquette: 4 (1 20k scorer)
Houston: 4 (3 20k scorers... lmao)
Michigan: 7 (0 20k scorers)
Florida: 5 (0 20k scorers)
Points aren't everything, of course, but they tend to be a good measure of how long a guy stays in the league, and guys tend to stay in the league a long time because they're good. There are outliers, naturally (Victor Oladipo's probably a starter for Indiana; Draymond is unquestionably a starter for Michigan State, and neither guy will end up with 10k points), but for the most part the above list tells a pretty accurate tale.
Anyway, here's the breakdown:
1. UCLA would curb stomp all comers. They're the clear No. 1.
2. UNC, Kansas, Kentucky & Duke are the next tier.
3. We're in the next group. I honestly think we've got an argument to be at the top of it, but man we've got to start putting elite players into the league again.
EDIT: And one point I've made elsewhere... Calhoun recognized the pace & space era early and recruited towards it (wings who could shoot, bigs who could run). Basically everybody we put into the league from Cliff to Rudy would be 20% better -- including guys like Travis & Smitty -- in today's game. Zero other programs can say the same other than maybe Villanova.
EDIT2: Just realized I really underrated Michigan State's team of Magic, Jason Richardson, Steve Smith, ZBo & Dray with guys like Scott Skiles, Kevin Willis, Jared Jackson, Gary Harris & Mo Pete off the bench. They're in that second tier with Duke, UNC, KU & UK.
Last edited: