Would the genie also mention the 35 point loss? Otherwise, I would take it.
Neither. I'm taking the Jeannie instead.How many of you, if a genie came to you before the season and said "you can be 6-2 with loses to Michigan State and Arkansas going into the Cuse game or start from scratch" would've taken 6-2?
As I said elsewhere, I would take the 6-2, but you have to admit this is about the least encouraging possible path to that 6-2.
How many of you, if a genie came to you before the season and said "you can be 6-2 with loses to Michigan State and Arkansas going into the Cuse game or start from scratch" would've taken 6-2?
.
Stop.
We’re 6-2 and have lost by 60 to the only two tournament teams we’ve played.
That genie should go console Oregon.
Here's the thing: 6-2 is good. But the difference between 4-4 UConn and 6-2 UConn is two overtime periods vs the #138 and #188 teams in the kenpom. Let's see how we look our next 4 games before conference play, could easily be 7-5 heading into WSU at our current level of play.
F Cuse, let's win.
I agree, this has been less than ideal
However, you didn't answer my question.
Would you have taken his offer?
No.
6-2 is the absolute minimum I would have expected given the schedule.
The genie would have had to have offered 7-1.
Records don't mean squat in a sport where the team pool of Division 1 consists of over 350 teams with 10 miles of variability between them all talent and resource wise top to bottom. How the play looks on the court, how well the team performs the fundamentals game in and game out, how prepared they are for each matchup, tells the fan everything about how the team is doing not some nonsense X-Y record that really doesn't mean anything now that we live in the AAC, where the committee couldn't care less about how many wins we have while outside of the P5.No.
6-2 is the absolute minimum I would have expected given the schedule.
The genie would have had to have offered 7-1.
I agree 100%