- Joined
- Apr 1, 2013
- Messages
- 7,390
- Reaction Score
- 19,960
The below in bold were the prior posts you made that I replied to. I see though you did initially make mention to both players which I missed but then in bold I suppose because the way I phrased the questions, we were speaking specifcially of Jana at least the bold in which you replied to me states Jana only. Not Ice. As I said now,-- I see from the start that you did iniitally include Ice which i missed- I feel Ice could have a game then Jana could have a game etc. And Ice is easier to get her type of shots and easier to play for pace. But that's beside the point. I’m fine with adding both as a combined 2 but they need the Big 3 to create for them vs the top teams other than very few baskets on their own.from my earlier post.......
"...there's no reason that Jana and Ice shouldn't be combining for twenty points and twelve rebounds a game in the Big East...."
there's no reason for UConn to stop shooting threes when they are making them but as we've already seen in numerous games, the offense can get bogged down when they aren't......having a capable low post presence simply gives them another scoring option to consider......
My point about Paige/Sarah and Azzi is that they aren't just 3point shooters. Once they get comfortable playing with each other and once the defense improves with the addition of Aubrey, the offense shouldn't get bogged down enough so that UCONN needs to focus on Jana/Ice to score. More time together with the Big 3, why wouldn't their chemistry improve? Why plan for them bogging down at such a level rather than planning for them to beat the defense enough? The top 3 players are top tier players for a reason. They should be feeding Jana/Ice to score in tough games only if they feel she/they has/have the easiest opportunity to score at a high efficiency because of the situation they created against the defense. The opposing team which is supposedly elite isn't going to so easily let Jana/Ice get position 3-5 feet from the basket very often. There is a reason why they are good. It's because they won't let “the Jana's” get layups and/or bury them on their own in the post. The best way Jana is getting layups and easy shots at the rim would be because of the situation UCONN's super 3 put the opposing team’s defense in.
the more effective Jana becomes offensively down low, the more wide-open shots will be available for the rest of the team......
That may be true but why should UConn ignore their inside game if Jana shows she can be a legit scoring threat?
Last edited:
