Transfer clearly don’t have that big of an impact on recruiting. Look at Maryland and Baylor. They constantly have kids transferring out (seems like a yearly occurrence at Maryland) and yet they are constantly replacing any outgoing talent with a 4-6 kid recruiting class—usually with many Top 30 recruits. It seems like conference, school location (as it relates to the recruits), and school quality (both the basketball program and the academic side of things) play a larger role. No many top recruits heading to Missouri State over Missouri. The same can be said of schools like UCF and ECU over schools like Florida State and Duke. UCF is in Orlando (a pretty nice city to be compared to Storrs during the winter, I’d say), but they aren’t getting better recruits because of location. Likewise, ECU is only 2 hours from Duke, but Duke has more name recognition, a better (read: more storied) program, and is in a better conference. Players want to go places that have a lot to offer even if those things never end up seeing the light of day.