Not happening. He'll bring in ok recruits, mostly high mid-major maybe. He might occasionally get lucky with an under the radar guy. But the combination of conference affiliation and his lack of a "name" (and please no he was a backup point guard for 13 years...nobody cares) will be huge obstacles. Calipari brought guys to UMass by paying them. He brought them to Memphis because he was Calipari. Just like Pitino brought guys to Louisville because he was Pitino. Calhoun could probably continue to recruit blue chippers to UConn even in the Big Mess conference. Ollie, not so much.
You need to clarify this a bit more for me to make sure I understand exactly what you mean. What do you consider high mid-major recruits? Are those top 76-100 recruits, 50-75, 100+, etc. Obviously there are different rating services but let's just use general consensus as an example.
I get you will argue the following aren't Ollie recruits, but I'm not asking that, I want to know which of the following are studs, high majors, high mid-majors, mid-majors, low, under the radar, etc. I'm just trying to calibrate what exactly you mean going forward:
2013:
Kentan Facey
Terrance Samuel
2012:
Omar Calhoun
Philip Nolan
Leon Tolksdorf
2011:
Ryan Boatright
DeAndre Daniels
Andre Drummond
I do get what you are saying about UMass, though they only really had a few stud recruits, from my recollection, on their final four (vacated) team.
However, Memphis still recruits at an extremely high level. You can argue that Calipari started the high level recruiting but he has been gone 3 years now and they still get quite a few high level recruits a year.
Another school that recruits at a high level is UNLV (currently) with Dave Rice. Do you think he is cheating? He has the best freshman (arguably) in the country this year and quite a few other top 50-100 kids on the roster.
Or we can look at Xavier which was getting good recruits pre-brawl.
Sure UConn may not recruit at the level of Duke, UNC, UCLA, or UK but has it ever?