Shortening the roster by cutting the minutes of players who were "off" didn't hurt at all in this game. Won't hurt in most games. Does that mean I'd be totally happy with it going forward, against any opponent? No...not necessarily.
I have a hypothesis: That owing to a combination of factors (such as other teams improving their physio), the conditioning gap between UConn and the average other team has narrowed. And whereas there would previously only be a tiny handful of teams that could outright match UConn's conditioning, ala Notre Dame during the Diggins years, now it's almost a given that very good teams can.
If so, it would be more likely now than in the past that UConn's seven can be worn down by the 4th and defeated by a seemingly fresher opponent. I think this explains at least some of what happened in the early meeting with South Carolina, in which Paige and CW played 39 minutes, ONO 34, Evina 31.
NC State is next, and I honestly don't quite know enough about them to say whether or not I'd be happy running seven against them. If we get through them - and it certainly is an "if" - then I would say that I'd be especially leery to hear that we would be running seven against either Stanford or South Carolina. I'm not saying that everyone needs 20 minutes...I'd just like to limit our core lineup to 32 or so.