UConnSwag11
Storrs, CT The Mecca
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 14,383
- Reaction Score
- 57,373
My thoughts exactly....why because Sampson coached in the vaunted big12 with zero final 4 teams & played NOBODY in non-conf....a joke.Lol total clown show
The same media guys that vote for the top 25. I assume he lost because his personality rubs some folks the wrong way (probably some other parts of the country).Who votes?
Hmm, do they post who voted for whom?The same media guys that vote for the top 25. I assume he lost because his personality rubs some folks the wrong way (probably some other parts of the country).
I was wondering if it was before the tournament. Makes it a bit more bearable. Houston did lose to Iowa St by 30 before the tournament though…The AP voted on this before the tournament. At that point, it was a fair tossup. Both teams lost a lot from good teams and then won their leagues and got 1 seeds.
Houston/Sampson got the edge for changing to a tougher league and having one of their recently graduated players die in the offseason and having to deal with that.
No he isn't. Not this year with what Hurley did. After the players he lost.#disrepsect
Sampson's a hell of a coach. Would have liked to see Hurley win it but Sampson is certainly worthy.
No he isn't. Not this year with what Hurley did. After the players he lost.
Did they vote on it before the conference tournament when Houston lost by 700 while #1 UConn cruised to a Big East tournament title? Nobody thought Houston was going to win it all heading into the NCAA's, everyone was picking UConn.The AP voted on this before the tournament. At that point, it was a fair tossup. Both teams lost a lot from very good teams and then won their leagues and got 1 seeds.
Houston/Sampson got the edge for changing to a tougher league and having one of their recently graduated players die in the offseason and having to deal with that.
CBS voted more recently and gave it to Hurley, making the tiebreak getting to the final four.
(Actually, Geno did it between 2002 and 2003 while losing 4 top-6 WNBA draft picks and returning Diana Taurasi and a bunch of role players.)It's ridiculous. NOBODY and I mean NOBODY -- not John Wooden, not Coach K, not Geno -- has ever come close to winning back-to-back titles after losing 3 starters and 58% of the team's scoring. It's an absolutely amazing accomplishment. Sampson's team had a very good year and I have a lot of respect for his ability and accomplishments. But give me a g0ddamn break!!!
Actually, Auriemma won back to back after losing 4 out of 5 starters, including three Olympians, and having to the start two freshmen. The one returning player was Taurasi.It's ridiculous. NOBODY and I mean NOBODY -- not John Wooden, not Coach K, not Geno -- has ever come close to winning back-to-back titles after losing 3 starters and 58% of the team's scoring. It's an absolutely amazing accomplishment. Sampson's team had a very good year and I have a lot of respect for his ability and accomplishments. But give me a g0ddamn break!!!
Houston lost 3 starters as well. They also jumped to a much tougher league and won it in their first year. Hurley lost by two votes, it's not like he was completely ignoredNo he isn't. Not this year with what Hurley did. After the players he lost.