Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 3513624, member: 3535"] That list is not to be evaluated as who is best. You can't use their analysis for that because they use their projections for "player ceilings" too which jumps "player performances." It's not they are wrong. It's "who cares who they have as number 1 team." They can't possibly be even an iota close. For example - you can go back in the history for Maya Moore and Brianna Stewart. Hoopgurlz rated them as "98." So what they are doing here is building up other players ceilings if everything goes "absolutely perfectly" for them and putting them in the same tier as these 2. That is just an example. One player basketball is a huge huge impact. Maya and Steiw were a cut above the others. But HG doesn't recognize that in their ratings. In some manner, they can't. And this will be similar Paige. She'll be one of the great 10 huskies of all time after 1-3. Think of when Kelly Faris was rated at hoogurlz as "34." Yet the end of her senior year she was 2nd team all-american. Kelly played with the all-time greats. For what she was-- the superstars allowed her to be excellent. Paige is going to have a super-great affect on all her teammates as well. Just because a player can't create her own shot that well, doesn't mean she won't perform at an extremely high level. You could have one main player that breaks down the defenses. You don't need 5. There are 19 other players with the same rating as Paige. That might be "ceiling / fantasy" but it's not reality. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,461

Messages: 4,397,091

Members: 10,210

Latest member: noelle