Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="tzznandrew, post: 2664903, member: 168"] You asked for evidence of something I never said. Grant Hill's 27 year (26ppg on 50.1 eFG%, 6.5rpg, 5apg) was both his best statistical (you [I]can[/I] argue that 23 or 24 year old season, but let's say 27) season, and, given historical precedent, likely his plateau. It was a great season. It wasn't a Top 15 type season. Whatever it is you are trying to argue with me is irrelevant, because that was the conversation at hand. Despite that, I gave you a statistical analysis--that looked at players' peaks and if you clicked the link gave details on 71 players--that analyzed when players hit their peak. 27 was, on average, their peak: a peak that, per my actual argument rather than the one you invented for me, would suggest Hill was a great, but not Top 15 player all time. Given this, I am uninterested in continuing this conversation. [/QUOTE]