I find this post (and many after) to be misinformed at best. Mostly It screams of living in denial towards many pervasive hot-button issues of college life...Everywhere.
I graduated from UConn in 1999. While I've visited on numerous occasions since then, I am admittedly unaware of many changes to student life policies since May 14 of that year.
1) Many, many students (regardless of gender) partake in underage drinking at UConn. I did, my then-girlfriend did, my roommate, most of my dormmates did, dare I say much of my matriculating class did. The RAs' attitude was out of site, out of mind in terms of underage drinking. Underage drinking in the dorms on Campus, off Campus, or at any other school was/is not unusual by any measure (personal experience = UMass, Boston College, Ithaca College)
1a) Unless something has changed, most dorm buildings at UConn (and the aforementioned) were co-ed, many by floor. There were also some floors (McMahon 6S comes to mind) that were co-ed by room. West Campus was co-ed by wing I.e. 3rd Flr Hollister E was men, 3rd Flr. Hollister W was women, with nary a fire door separating the two wings. Only Sprague (Men), Shippee, and Holcomb (Both women) were one gender. Even then, it was not difficult to enter the dorms unescorted by a resident.
2.) Agreed, but all students, regardless of financial assistance level or athletic ability, are made aware of student life policy, on and off campus.
Do Athletes go through orientation and Husky WOW? Does Husky WOW even exist anymore? It was drilled into our heads at that point about the dangers of drugs, alcohol (underage or otherwise), assault, nightly hook-ups/one night stands/STDs, etc. It was also drilled into our heads that a huge amount of assaults are perpetrated by acquaintances (i.e. signing into dorms may not prevent what allegedly occurred).
3.) Do they sign people in now? In my day, you needed was the key to enter the building after a certain time (9:00 IIRC), but the main doors were unlocked until the RA on duty did his/her rounds. As I said in 2. above, a huge amount of assaults are perpetrated by acquaintances, and therefore signing into dorms may not prevent what allegedly occurred. Depending on how long these ledgers are kept, it may confirm a timeline and alibi, but it would not prevent malfeasance.
4.) Total agree. Depending and statute of limitations, the detective should not have dismissed the complaint out of hand. But alcohol/underage drinking doesn't even factor into this part of the case. Besides, it is impossible to confirm underage intoxication unless there is a breathalyzer reading from that night. What should have happened at the very least are interviews of pertinent witnesses. Based on that, the State's attorney or other responsible authoritative body, should determine viability of pursuing the case.
5) This is sort of short sighted at best. Not all athletes are criminals, and not all criminals are athletes. There's a fine line between a continuation of High School and treating these young men and women like the young adults that they are.
I cherish my time at UConn. It was quite possibly the best four years of my life. To read someone trying to reduce my experiences as occurring at a place where women and children need to be hidden and we were lucky to get out alive is annoying. You may use this one isolated incident as an indictment on UConn. I hope no one else does.