formerlurker
www.stjude.org
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2012
- Messages
- 5,765
- Reaction Score
- 28,418
You my friend should be in marketing/sales, you'd make a fortune.Nice to see he still has fire in his belly.
A lousy pro, but gave us a great Final year. Was fun watching him dominate Curly from BC. Thabeet gave us more than Drummond, who was awful his one year.
AD- 10 pts, 2.7 blocks, 7.6 boards as a freshman.Thabeet gave us more than Drummond, who was awful his one year.
A lousy pro, but gave us a great Final year. Was fun watching him dominate Curly from BC. Thabeet gave us more than Drummond, who was awful his one year.
Any variation on "Drummond was awful" means cue the ignore button. How many times can we have the same debate here?
A lousy pro, but gave us a great Final year. Was fun watching him dominate Curly from BC. Thabeet gave us more than Drummond, who was awful his one year.
Awful? Huh what AD were you watching? He would totally dominate a freshman HT. Matter of fact he might even dominate a JR HT. He didn't have a defined post game but he was super athletic and could take it to the hoop like no other big man we had. Unfortunately for him he was on a very talented but dysfunctional team. AD was a good player his first year and would have turned into a great player if he stayed a couple more years. I think you need to stop the hate on a great ambassador for UCONN basketball. Yes, it would have been nice he could have stayed more than 1 year but as witnessed by his NBA success he mad the right choice going after his freshman year especially since we got banned the following year for post season play.A lousy pro, but gave us a great Final year. Was fun watching him dominate Curly from BC. Thabeet gave us more than Drummond, who was awful his one year.
And the pendulum swings back too far in the other direction.Matter of fact [freshman Drummond] might even dominate a JR HT.
Not sure which statement is more incorrect.. That Drummond was awful or Thabeet dominated Curly who played at least 5 years before Thabeet.
Awful? Huh what AD were you watching? He would totally dominate a freshman HT. Matter of fact he might even dominate a JR HT.
Why not HT was a good college player when playing in space but if he had to play man to man defense he was a little slow. I could see AD going by him over and over for a dunk. As we saw in the NBA HT was an awful on man on man defense.And the pendulum swings back too far in the other direction.
Why not HT was a good college player when playing in space but if he had to play man to man defense he was a little slow. I could see AD going by him over and over for a dunk. As we saw in the NBA HT was an awful on man on man defense.
Again I'm talking man to man. I could see HT deficiencies being shown(lack of foot quickness) against AD one on one. That is all I'm talking about. Not how they performed in a team game with different teammates.NBA ≠ college. And NBA Drummond ≠ college Drummond.
HT was closer to a great college center than he was to a good college center.
Again I'm talking man to man. I could see HT deficiencies being shown(lack of foot quickness) against AD one on one. That is all I'm talking about. Not how they performed in a team game with different teammates.
Amateur hour compared to this forum.The comment section is brutal.
Amateur hour compared to this forum.
It isn't any better face to face!Any public website comment section is to be avoided at all costs. Unless you have a clamoring for feeling awful about our species ...
Again I'm talking man to man. I could see HT deficiencies being shown(lack of foot quickness) against AD one on one. That is all I'm talking about. Not how they performed in a team game with different teammates.
Any variation on "Drummond was awful" means cue the ignore button. How many times can we have the same debate here?