- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 7,514
- Reaction Score
- 25,092
You'd think people would learn - I mean there used to be people who had Cochran
Comparing Boyle to Cochran is asinine.
You'd think people would learn - I mean there used to be people who had Cochran
Comparing Boyle to Cochran is asinine.
I'm not comparing them dolt. You are doing what others did and crowning a quarterback based on next to nothing.
Coming from the newly minted moron i'll take that as a compliment.
I think Boyle should play this year, but my issue was playing him yesterday
I have no idea what's going to happen.
The kid looks like he has a lot of potential - but locking someone into the quarterback position for 3+ years is wildly premature - especially for a team with no coach.
You'd think people would learn - I mean there used to be people who had Cochran or Lagow locked into the job for seasons before they played a down...
So who is competing with Boyle for the QB job? You seem to know something nobody else does. Whoever it is you have in mind, he must be one heck of a player.
Seriously, give us the name(s)
The idea that Boyle will be our QB the next three years hardly seems controversial to me.
This makes you a Moron, should we have saved Boyle for the Memphis game?
Boyle played because the coaching staff believes he gives the team and program the best near and long-term option to consistently win. Everything else on this thread is speculation.....
Kid could end up being very good. We'll see.....
Boyle played because the coaching staff believes he gives the team and program the best near and long-term option to consistently win. Everything else on this thread is speculation.....
Kid could end up being very good. We'll see.....
There is this process called recruiting. Through this process new players join the team every year.
There are events called injuries in which players get hurt, miss games and potentially have their ability damaged.
I don't need to be able to name a player - it's beyond stupid to assume a player who has played one game is going to be the starter for the next 40+ games.
Well obviously if someone gets injured (duh), I thought we were talking about talent. If we get somebody more talented then this kid then good for us, I just doubt it will happen so I expect Boyle to be the QB the next three years (barring injury, which I didn't think needed to be stated)
Well obviously if someone gets injured (duh), I thought we were talking about talent. If we get somebody more talented then this kid then good for us, I just doubt it will happen so I expect Boyle to be the QB the next three years (barring injury, which I didn't think needed to be stated)
Or Weist knows we will be lucky to win 2 games so he is starting the fan favorite at QB. Or Manuel is ordering him to start Boyle. Or......
You are most likely correct with all the statements. Me personally, I still would have started whitmer
I would have also, but I can still understand going with Boyle and it might be the best longer-term option for the team and program. Tough call.
a total "coaches decision" move. What I feel bad about is CW losing his starting job due to the 2 old bags running the show for the last 2+ years. I would have been curious to see him play at least 1 game, 1 half, hell 1 quarter under TJs system
unless you sit in on practices, or watched this kid a ton in high school. based on a 15 of 43 day, how can gauge any sort of "talent" for the next 3+ years?