Griner Annulment Petition Denied | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Griner Annulment Petition Denied

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't see how Glory is a gold digger in this. They entered into this marriage together, and according to court documents, Brittney signed off on the IVF treatments, and then left Glory high and dry. Glory can't play, which means that she isn't under the WNBA health insurance. I don't know if she has medical insurance or not (I assume she does), but I don't know how much that costs to cover prenatal care, doctor visits, hospital stays, etc. on top of rent, bills, groceries, and the list goes on.

If Brittney didn't want to have kids, they shouldn't have signed the paperwork.
 
mtsuraider06 said:
I don't see how Glory is a gold digger in this. They entered into this marriage together, and according to court documents, Brittney signed off on the IVF treatments, and then left Glory high and dry. Glory can't play, which means that she isn't under the WNBA health insurance. I don't know if she has medical insurance or not (I assume she does), but I don't know how much that costs to cover prenatal care, doctor visits, hospital stays, etc. on top of rent, bills, groceries, and the list goes on.

If Brittney didn't want to have kids, they shouldn't have signed the paperwork.
Expand ...
If this were a hetero couple and the male walked as soon as the female became pregnant, wouldn't we support her alimony request for the time until she can return to her job?
 
ThisJustIn said:
I can think of several marriages that would fall under that assessment.

That being said, it's not much fun to make fun of someone else's emotional pain...
Expand ...
It's kinda fun when it's self inflicted.
 
meyers7 said:
Beat me to it. :D
Expand ...
meyers7 said:
Beat me to it. :D
Expand ...

If a test were given to judge the mental abilities to get married among other things--no one would be married. Oh yes hardly anyone is, even without the test!! Just think how humans would fare should they be tested for the mental ability to have children or readiness???
And now both sexes have a pill to help them??? Ahem!!!!

Meyers----On the Wheel of Fortune this evening --the tiles spelled out Knoxville, Tenn. Can you guess what the category was?? Ithought they did this one just for you.!!!!
 
Gate81 said:
If this were a hetero couple and the male walked as soon as the female became pregnant, wouldn't we support her alimony request for the time until she can return to her job?
Expand ...
90,999,999 (minus 1) would be marching on DC to make sure she got it.
 
.-.
meyers7 said:
Places meyers7 hates? :cool:
Expand ...
Aw Shucks!! I thought you'd say---EVIL EMPIRE!!! But I guess that's a close second.
Interesting that I immediately thought of your want those "tiles" came up ---Knoxville, Tenn.
 
mtsuraider06 said:
I don't see how Glory is a gold digger in this. They entered into this marriage together, and according to court documents, Brittney signed off on the IVF treatments, and then left Glory high and dry. Glory can't play, which means that she isn't under the WNBA health insurance. I don't know if she has medical insurance or not (I assume she does), but I don't know how much that costs to cover prenatal care, doctor visits, hospital stays, etc. on top of rent, bills, groceries, and the list goes on.

If Brittney didn't want to have kids, they shouldn't have signed the paperwork.
Expand ...

Wasn't that the original purpose of MARRIAGE?? To have people together in marriage having children, supporting, feeding, caring, educating them. Notice I didn't say which sexes, or how many people in a marriage--political correctness, is the watch word that is watching. With the money BG makes overseas she doesn't need insurances to cover these bills you speak of--but Glory's smart lawyer and a broad minded judge will sort this out. There is nothing more contentious than two people who once expressed undying love and lust to each other now want to skin the other dry. Ain't life grand!!
 
BroadwayVa said:
Aw Shucks!! I thought you'd say---EVIL EMPIRE!!! But I guess that's a close second.
Interesting that I immediately thought of your want those "tiles" came up ---Knoxville, Tenn.
Expand ...
Yea, that would work too. :cool:
 
Griner is pissed on Twitter because a few people were saying Happy Father's Day to her :oops:
 
.-.
the gold digger talk is kinda tired. they both planned a family together and it it is VERY expensive to have a pregnancy like glory's. i don't have any sympathy for a person with griner's history of physicality. no one knows what really happened. at the end of the day, we are talking about domestic violence. it's sad as hell.
 
LadyVols9 said:
the gold digger talk is kinda tired. they both planned a family together and it it is VERY expensive to have a pregnancy like glory's. i don't have any sympathy for a person with griner's history of physicality. no one knows what really happened. at the end of the day, we are talking about domestic violence. it's sad as hell.
Expand ...
Just to be clear I believe they were both fighting and I am not sure who I would give an advantage in that kind of confrontation - Griner has a few inches but Johnson is no shrinking violet - I don't think you can be a pro ball player without a level of 'moxie'. I am pretty sure that is why they both received the same penalty from the league.
 
UcMiami said:
Just to be clear I believe they were both fighting and I am not sure who I would give an advantage in that kind of confrontation - Griner has a few inches but Johnson is no shrinking violet - I don't think you can be a pro ball player without a level of 'moxie'. I am pretty sure that is why they both received the same penalty from the league.
Expand ...
and we really dont expect a LV fan to defend Griner over one of their own
 
Kaizen said:
WTF, Glory thinks she is a big celebrity? Need $20,000/month to survive?
Expand ...


I'm no fan of DG but it is CLEAR that GJ is a Gold-Digger of the highest order making a Money Grab. No way does she need or deserve $20,000/month. $5,000/month is more than enough BUT clearly that would not support the Lifestyle that GJ became accustomed to during her extensive 28 day marriage. ;):rolleyes:
 
The judge should have allowed the annulment because there was no consummation, according to the legal definition. There might be a case made for a legal definition change, but laws are made by legislatures, not by courts, at least in a democracy or democratic republic. If judges make the rules instead of interpreting them, it could get very dicey for all of us. They might just rule you illegal.
 
Roger G said:
The judge should have allowed the annulment because there was no consummation, according to the legal definition. There might be a case made for a legal definition change, but laws are made by legislatures, not by courts, at least in a democracy or democratic republic. If judges make the rules instead of interpreting them, it could get very dicey for all of us. They might just rule you illegal.
Expand ...
You need to review the Courts decisions over the last 4 years---,
Allowing Corporations to pile money into campaigns---one person or group drops millions and that can change the direction of the country. A long stretch to find that remotely in the Constitution.

The Court changed a legislatively directed fee, in a law, to a tax. Supposedly only the congress can levy taxes
You are correct in that we are not a Democracy but a Democratic Republic--where one person represents thousands--.
 
.-.
these requests are based on income they happen all the time with people who have money! lol I don't see the controversy. they bought a house together and decided to start a family. I don't agree with either person's actions but I also don't blame glory for seeking money. things can get messy when two people build a life together and one walks away. that's just the reality.
 
Glory really took it to Brittney during the latter part of the game last night.
It was fun to watch knowing the back story and it must have been hard for the announcer to not comment.
 
BroadwayVa said:
You need to review the Courts decisions over the last 4 years---,
Allowing Corporations to pile money into campaigns---one person or group drops millions and that can change the direction of the country. A long stretch to find that remotely in the Constitution.

The Court changed a legislatively directed fee, in a law, to a tax. Supposedly only the congress can levy taxes
You are correct in that we are not a Democracy but a Democratic Republic--where one person represents thousands--.
Expand ...
I'm not sure I get why you want me to review court cases. It sounds like you and I agree. I'm against anyone, (corporations, activists, anyone) who contorts the legal system.
 
Roger G said:
I'm not sure I get why you want me to review court cases. It sounds like you and I agree. I'm against anyone, (corporations, activists, anyone) who contorts the legal system.
Expand ...
I was just pointing out that even the Highest Court makes poor, if not bad, decision and not necessarily in accordance with the Constitution.
No insult or negatives intended.
The courts, the lower courts, sometimes make decisions driven by popularity. If every court decision was in accordance to the written word of the Constitution I would accept it, but even those words are open to the mind set of the reader. The legal system shall never be perfect, it's run by humans.
I do agree with you!! Sorry, if it came/comes out sounding differently..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,381
Messages
4,569,626
Members
10,475
Latest member
Tunwin22


Top Bottom