I love the arguments that start I didn’t see the game… the game plan didn’t call for the team throwing. Some of that is obviously a function of player ability and some of it is a function of the team was able to run pretty much at will. In general, it was one of Evers better games based on what he was asked to do.
There were two three and outs, one was on a drop of a very catchable ball. The offense scored 34 points and averaged 6 yards a play. The offense did its job. Would people feel better if the two drops didn’t happen and he was 12-16 for 110 yards? Sure, I guess, but most of the people complaining weren’t going to be satisfied unless UConn put up 300 yards passing, which wasn’t what was necessary (or possible with the personnel/gameplan choices made). The miss to Gathings was the most egregious mistake on the day. There was plenty of time to set his feet and make the throw, do people feel better if it was 11-16 for 106 and 2 scores with a 38-28 win (or even 13-16 for 135)?
Not every game has to be a referendum on the QB. UConn won and averaged 6 yards a play. The offense largely executed what was needed which in and of itself indicates that the premise of the thread… Gordon Sammis is in fact doing a good job.