Icebear
Andlig Ledare
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 18,781
- Reaction Score
- 19,225
If he's 100% innocent than I can't disagree more. This will be a battle in the courts that might take years to work itself out. But right now this is also a PR battle. Image means a lot. As a UConn coach hitting the recruiting trails, as a coach for the USA team. As a representative of UConn wherever he goes.
It doesn't help your image to appear like you're just going to "Lawyer Up" and hide behind a statement and calmly talk generalities in your first public appearance since the suit.
Now if you're not 100% innocent than I agree that's exactly what you do. So I don't know, maybe I'm thinking that there is at least some small piece of this story that might be accurate.
But if he is completely innocent, people (outside of this thread I guess) like to see some real human reactions to a baseless lie. His reputation and a piece of UConn's reputation is at stake.
You may want that emotion and disagree but I am telling you that that my training and experience in counseling tells me that you desire would be the more abnormal response for an innocent person whether you want otherwise or not. Cam, well notes the risk of doing otherwise, as well.
Geno's spot on SNY was perfect. A guy who was at ease with himself and his situation who acknowledges he cannot address the issue until more is known. He stated clearly in the media that the accusations will be proven wrong. His emotional level was perfect.
Most Americans today are sophisticated enough to understand what the counsel of lawyers is going to be. Jerry Sandusky who likely is guilty really hurt his position with the interview he gave to Bob Costas. Amendola should never have let him near the media near his client.