Geno Surprised Sky Picked KLS. | The Boneyard

Geno Surprised Sky Picked KLS.

My prediction is reinforced that Lou will be with a better fit team for her when next draft roles around and he can got 2 players he thinks he needs in a trade of Lou to a higher quality team. Be a real shame if she ended up in Seattle or Phoenix right? Head bang:confused::p:D
 
What team would be a good fit for Lou next year?
 
.-.
Why not Phoenix? I think she could contribute a lot at the 3 there and be closer to home. I don't see the Aces for Lou as long as Young and McBride are there. I think LA could clean house a bit and then have room for Lou.
 
Her mom is correct too. The coach looks like something not too pretty now.
Geno's statement only validates the coach not playing her more. It is critical of the GM who drafted her onto a team which really had no immediate need for her skill set. It only justifies the coaches actions, while placing the blame where it belongs- the GM who drafted her. Perhaps they expected to trade her and the deal never materialized. Maybe they can work out a deal for LA's Parker?
 
Geno's statement only validates the coach not playing her more. It is critical of the GM who drafted her onto a team which really had no immediate need for her skill set. It only justifies the coaches actions, while placing the blame where it belongs- the GM who drafted her. Perhaps they expected to trade her and the deal never materialized. Maybe they can work out a deal for LA's Parker?
James Wade is the coach and GM
 
Deshields and CVS are givens Lou should have started at the other guard but hard to get playing time there when the one starting is married to the PG!
 
I was a little puzzled by the selection too, given that Diamond was an emerging star and Gabby was on the roster. Wade chose to play Lou at the 4 and Gabby at the 1, which seemed really odd. I can see Lou as the back-up and heir-apparent to Quigley. She's 11 years younger than Allie.
 
Last edited:
.-.
The best fit for KLS maybe Phoenix. Bonner is a threat anywhere on the floor, and Griner draws so much attention. This can give KLS the time and space to get off a shot.

the alternative is LA, who desperately need 3-point shooting. KLS is on a rookie contract too, which could be beneficial to LA’s payroll managing all of their veterans
 
I see KLS from a different viewpoint than most on this board. For me, KLS is one of the best outside shooters in WBB. So ,IMHO, KLS would fit better with a team that emphasizes trying to set her up for 3 pointers. I realize most of you will not agree but I think the Dallas Wings would be a great fit for KLS.
 
2 current WNBA coaches are getting a close up view of Lou, at training camp, at practice and during the game(both on the floor and on the bench).
Agler I am sure knows what he gets, hard work and BB IQ, as he has coached Karlie in both LA and Dallas.
 
Last edited:
2 current WNBA coaches are getting a close up view of Lou, at training camp, at practice and during the game(both on the floor and on the bench).
Agler I am sure knows what he gets, hard work and BBQ, as he has coached Karlie in both LA and Dallas.

The BBQ was interesting and I did not know the Samuelson's like that food category but I think I figured it out. BB IQ. :)
 
The BBQ was interesting and I did not know the Samuelson's like that food category but I think I figured it out. BB IQ. :)
Believe it or not I typed BBIQ and The Boneyard must have auto correct. I edited it above by spacing the 4 letters Will I have to edit in this message too?
 
Believe it or not I typed BBQ and The Boneyard must have auto correct. I edited it above by spacing the 4 letters Will I have to edit in this message too?
Yes, the Boneyard will not post B B I Q, with no spaces as B B I Q with no spaces, it becomes BBQ. Or maybe it is me only?
 
.-.
What team would be a good fit for Lou next year?
Any team Katie Lou Samuelson may be on. KLS, is a superstar in the making, her talent and desire is among the best Uconn has ever fielded. Don't cry for Katie Lou the world, in and out of Basketball, is her oyster.
 
I see KLS from a different viewpoint than most on this board. For me, KLS is one of the best outside shooters in WBB. So ,IMHO, KLS would fit better with a team that emphasizes trying to set her up for 3 pointers. I realize most of you will not agree but I think the Dallas Wings would be a great fit for KLS.
You may have been correct in your observation of KLS up to her senior year. In that year she became a more well rounded players, not just a set up 3 point shooter. She did her turns under the boards, attacked the boards, dished the ball, and yes played more defense. Geno was determined to make her a more valuable WNBA player. Top talent at Uconn is ready to walk into the W because Geno prepares them for that role.
 
I see KLS from a different viewpoint than most on this board. For me, KLS is one of the best outside shooters in WBB. So ,IMHO, KLS would fit better with a team that emphasizes trying to set her up for 3 pointers. I realize most of you will not agree but I think the Dallas Wings would be a great fit for KLS.
I don't disagree that they need her, I selfishly would just like her to go to a good team. I also would rather not be forced to watch Arike on the regular in order to see KLS.
 
Yes, the Boneyard will not post B B I Q, with no spaces as B B I Q with no spaces, it becomes BBQ. Or maybe it is me only?

Why the desire to not have a space between BB and IQ? :confused:
 
Aces. Slide McBride to the 2. Plum at point and Young first off the bench. Creates 3 pt threats and space for Wilson and Cambage.
So you're saying she could start for a team that made the semis when she couldn't get off the bench for an inferior team?
 
.-.
So you're saying she could start for a team that made the semis when she couldn't get off the bench for an inferior team?
Yep. That’s exactly what I’m saying. KLS is not as good as DD or Quigley period.

However, I think a natural scorer like KLS would be a better fit on the Aces. It would allow McBride to play the 2 which is where she should play and put Plum at the 1. Then let Young come in for Plum. Even though the Aces are a better team than the Sky, the Sky has way better Wings in my opinion and that’s where KLS plays.
 
is the WNBA just like AAU basketball? If your parents aren’t happy with your playing time, or don’t like the coach, you just move to a new team. Maybe Lou needs to work harder in the off-season. Work on her first step quickness so she can create her own shot. Work on defending. Make the coach have no choice but to play her.
 
is the WNBA just like AAU basketball? If your parents aren’t happy with your playing time, or don’t like the coach, you just move to a new team. Maybe Lou needs to work harder in the off-season. Work on her first step quickness so she can create her own shot. Work on defending. Make the coach have no choice but to play her.
My thoughts exactly. We seem to get one of these post every year: WNBA coach not utilizing former UCONN player correctly (KML, Saniya, Morgan, Azura.....and now KLS). KLS is struggling in her first year in the WNBA-BIG DEAL! She'll figure it out.
 
Her mom is correct too. The coach looks like something not too pretty now.

He just won WNBA Coach of the Year, so he looks to be okay, from my vantage point.

Geno's statement only validates the coach not playing her more. It is critical of the GM who drafted her onto a team which really had no immediate need for her skill set. It only justifies the coaches actions, while placing the blame where it belongs- the GM who drafted her. Perhaps they expected to trade her and the deal never materialized. Maybe they can work out a deal for LA's Parker?

This as a marathon, not a sprint. Simply because a player does not have an impact in her first year that means the coach and/or GM should be blamed and the player should be traded?

Natasha Howard was drafted fifth overall. She struggled to adjust to the speed and physical nature of the game (she looked lost on the court at times in Indiana). Once she adjusted, she then earned more minutes. And while they were not available (in Minnesota, her second team), she signed in her fifth season with her third team (Seattle), winning MIP and becoming an All Star.

In the NBA, we see it all the time...teams pick for the future, based on potential/ceiling. Allie Quigley is 33 years old and an established SG (three-time All Star). She cannot play forever. Grooming KLS to adjust to the speed of the game, to bigger and more physical defenders, and to getting her shot off more quickly is something the coaching staff should be and likely is doing.

Deshields and CVS are givens Lou should have started at the other guard but hard to get playing time there when the one starting is married to the PG!

With all due, as I mentioned earlier, Quigley was an All Star in 2017, 2018, and 2019. For her career, she is shooting 45.6 percent from the floor and 39.9 percent from three. In the last three years, she has averaged 16.4 ppg (2017), 15.4 ppg (2018), and 13.8 ppg (2019) -- while shooting a combined 48.8 percent from the floor and 43.0 percent from three in those three years.

I believe her on-court performance more than justifies her starting position at shooting guard.

My thoughts exactly. We seem to get one of these post every year: WNBA coach not utilizing former UCONN player correctly (KML, Saniya, Morgan, Azura.....and now KLS). KLS is struggling in her first year in the WNBA-BIG DEAL! She'll figure it out.

What is interesting is how quickly people blame the coach, instead of recognizing that the WNBA is vastly different from college. College coaches have systems, with the great coaches plugging players into those systems and masking weaknesses. In the professional game, innate talent about ability wins out.

On the men's side, Christian Laettner was one of the greatest college basketball players in the history of the game. But in the NBA, he played 13 seasons and averaged 12.8 ppg and 6.7 rpg for his career, with one All Star nod. Laettner was not the most athletic player, nor was he the most physical (although, ironically, his game is tailor-made for today's NBA, with a premium on shooting from all positions and the ability of bigs to demonstrate expanded range and passing). Does that take away from his college career? Absolutely not.

In some cases, it turns out the system truly made the player even better than she was -- e.g., Kaleena Mosqueda-Lewis. KML was an elite shooter in college -- truly elite. And Geno Auriemma was able to mask her limitations with his system. But her elite shooting and college accolades have not transferred into the same level of success in the pros. What she has found, after five years in the WNBA and three different head coaches, is her role with the Storm -- 12-14 minutes per game off the bench, averaging 5-5.5 points per game.

Is she equaling her collegiate performance and accolades in the pros? No. Is she a solid and vital cog on the Storm's bench? Absolutely.

And she has a WNBA championship to show for it.

If you look at Phoenix this year, there were three rookies -- Alanna Smith, Sophie Cunningham, and Brianna Turner. Turner made the All-Rookie team. When she was inserted as a starter due to injuries, she was able to adjust and defend really well at the four. Coach Sandy Brondello put her on Elena Delle Donne for large stretches. While EDD was able to score, you can watch the replay and see Turner elevating with a hand in EDD's face. The defense was incredible; the offense was just better. Turner started slow, but averaged 6.9 points, 7.0 rebounds, and 1.21 blocks in her final 14 games.

Now, Cunningham and Smith were not nearly as successful. But as Coach Brondello repeatedly stated, this was about getting the rookies experience -- and doing so on the biggest stages and in meaningful games. Phoenix was an older team this year, with Bonner, January, Taurasi, Little, Lytle, Carson, and Mitchell all at least 32 years old -- and Yvonne Turner turning 32 in October. Given they will not play forever, it is important to groom and develop players, while allowing them to do so.

In Phoenix's case, injuries to the veterans allowed the rookies to have more playing time. In Chicago's case, it did not. Adjusting to the pros means adjusting to the speed of the game, to new teammates (though there were a few familiar faces for KLS), etc. There is grooming in practice, as well as in games.

KLS was injured for 1/3 of the season. But she played in 20 games and averaged 7.7 minutes per contest. Alanna Smith, who was also injured, played in 18 games and averaged 7.2 minutes, while Sophie Cunningham got 12.2 minutes in 32 games (and that was with Taurasi missing most of the season, plus other backcourt injuries and players missing time because of overseas national team commitments). Yet Mercury fans, for the most part, recognize the need to think long-term. Again, it is a marathon, not a sprint.

KLS has plenty of time to figure things out and to find her role with the Sky (or, if traded, another team). But jumping all over the coach/GM based on the minutes of one season (a season in which KLS was injured for one-third of it) seems a bit out of place to me in the professional game, especially since this coach/GM just led his team to the league's third-best record (and an improvement of seven wins over last year), led the team to its third-best record in the 14-year history of the franchise, and won this year's WNBA Coach of the Year award
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,535
Messages
4,580,937
Members
10,491
Latest member
7774Forever


Top Bottom